HUMAN, CREATIVE, INDIVIDUAL WAY OF THINKING
On top of this, instead of putting in focus the various IMPERSONAL group categories, a paradigmatic shift of the way of thinking was made, where the human(e) beings, with their needs, wants and wishes, are in the centre of attention of all participating actors. The role of creative abilities was clearly emphasised, understood in terms of being adequately paid (including payment by the issued shares), instead of being cheaply exploited through fixed salaries by the top management and owners (investors). Apart from harsh criticising the purposeful production of vulgar minds DIA the SIMPLE(ST) ONES, in order to be satisfied the narrow-minded interests of ruling natiocratic elite, this creator of knowledge has also stressed importance of CONTINUAL increasing level of the achieved development of consciousness of its inhabitants. In the living reality, this is manifested by the recognisable human prick (pangs) of CONSCIENCE, that actually says someone, whether it was handled in a good or bad (evil) way, whether something good or evil nature is and the like. In order to be satisfied these higher human interests, the distinguishing GOOD from evil plays the central role during any kind of the interactively creative debate. In other words, as sooner this issue was resolved in accordance with the basic principles of the developed dialectical interactive approach, as more fruitful its creative outcome will be. From this reason, if it is not feasible to be established in relative terms, what is good and what is bad (evil), then it should be determined, understood in terms of the basic principles of the developed dialectical interactive approach, what is better from the available, accessible choices, ways, ..., accordingly in the utmost sense, WHAT IS LESS EVIL in a concrete scenario in time DIA situation in space. Keep in mind, each established societal order requires the suitable level of the developed consciousness of its inhabitants, which is externally manifested through the relation between the good and evil in a concrete society. In short, when the utmost limits of this gray zone of confrontation between good and evil are not set, then the vulgarity, anarchy, and demonstration of various natiocratic freedoms including the creative ones too will spread to these disputed areas until it occupies the entire realm of good.