puzzle of time and space
by Creator of Knowledge BoBan
The Pyramid of Cheops in Egypt
All greatest thinkers tried to unravel the puzzle of time and space. In this cluster of creative articles will be presented the dialectical understanding of time and space, which is based on the lost, hidden knowledge, pillars of which are the four elements (fire, water, air, earth). In this dialectical conception of time and space, all essential PICTORIAL imprints were embodied and eternalized in the pyramid of Cheops in Egypt. It is very important here to emphasize that this dialectical understanding of time and space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter), neither replaces nor entirely negates existing static ("absolute") and dynamic ("relativistic") conceptions of time and space, under condition that they are properly reconsidered and reinterpreted by this broad methodological context of the dialectical interactive approach. On the contrary, as it will be shown in this creative article, this dialectical understanding of time and space, in fact, complements and supplements the Newton's and Einstein's understanding of space and time. For additional information, read: Dialectical Conception of Time and Space.
I. Conceptions of Time and Space
In this creative article, the so-called absolutism [static view on time and space, that is, the understanding of time and space in an absolute sense], relativism [based on the relative dynamic motion of objects in space and time] and dialecticism [based on the power of dialectical change] "with Respect to Time (and Space)" will be more thoroughly reconsidered. In general, there are two main types of philosophical theories about whether time requires change: non-relativistic theories (classical physics) and relational theories. Because this creative article is intended for a wider circle of readers as well as the relational theory and other dynamic conceptions of time and space do not distinctly make difference BETWEEN dynamic and dialectical processes, all known conceptions of time AND space were classified and redefined as
- static conceptions of time AND space,
- dynamic conceptions of time AND space,
- DIALECTICAL conceptions of time DIA space.
Perhaps, you already have perceived to clearly distinguish these different conceptions of time "AND versus DIA" space from each other, a new preposition - conjunction "DIA" was introduced by me, as a substitute for the (recti)linear conjunction "AND".
Dynamic and Dialectical Processes
Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in Time DIA Space
The main characteristic of the dynamic processes is the (relative) MOVEMENT (motion), while the main feature of a dialectical process is the (dialectical) CHANGE, understood in terms of transition, transformation, metamorphose, transfiguration of a dialectical content into another one by means of various manifestations of dialectical negations of negations: annulment, annihilation, death...., final result of which is the renewal and regeneration of various states of the dialectical reality: its further development, stagnation, degeneration.... In this context, the dialectical change does not only refers to the quantitative changes in worlds of dialectics, respectively to the changes within it generally speaking but in the first place to the qualitative changes of time, in time dia the appropriate scope of space, particularly, seen from a dialectically long-run perspective. In short, everywhere you see a couple - dialect of statics DIA dynamics, the dialectic is already present there, regardless of whether it is perceivable with the five basic senses in that moment or not. As it will be later elaborated from the point of view of this applied dialectical methodological approach (dialectical interactive approach), this ostensible and misleading staticity of the rectilinear way of comprehending the dynamics of (dialectical) worlds around me ⇄ thee ⇄ us will be blown away, as it is traveled further
- [time embedded into space: NOW AND THERE, understood in terms of emotively emotional presence]
through this (recti) linear observation, perception, and understanding of the
- [matter embedded in) the past (Space in Time: the HERE AND NOW (on the Earth, for example), understood in the sense of physical presence (of body)],
in order to be revealed the true face and full meaning of the dialectic: dialectical change.
Couple Dialect: Thesis DIA Antithesis
Synthesis DIA "G - Hexagon" → The Renewed Thesis in Time DIA Space
ETC. through Time DIA Space UNTIL
"G" → The Temporary Conclusion of the Time (in Time) DIA Space is reached
In this creative article will be shown that precisely this insufficient paying attention to the (hidden) power of initiated dialectical processes (dia-processes, which emanate) from the depths of eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces, or to the real power of a dialectical change, if you so please, over the passage of this dialectical way of understanding the time DIA space, was the main weakness, not only of the Newtonian understanding of time and space but of the dynamical understanding of time and space by Einstein, too. Or put it in another way, this too modern scientific approach to the creation of knowledge, which relays on the (fragile) power of five basic scientific senses, understood in terms of their limited range within the continuously created, changed and renewed worlds of dialectics through continuous reworking, reshaping, regeneration, and the rebirth of theirs, is, in fact, the main source of all the troubles arising from this previously mentioned scientific (methodological) weakness.
For all these mentioned reasons, in this creative article, the focus was put on the various manifestations of the PRIMARY LAW (rule) of dialectic in time DIA space. Seen from the methodological point of view, the primary law of dialectic follows the fundamental methodical pattern of the dialectical interactive approach:
- the Renewed Thesis
- the Suplemented and Complemented Antithesis
- the Renewed Thesis at this new level of Time DIA Space
and so on in Time DIA Space
- UNTIL the TEMPORARY CONCLUSION of the considered span of Time DIA appropriate scope of Space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter) is achieved.
On the other hand, static models of reality are based on the (recti) linear conceiving and understanding of the time: past ⇢ present (time) ⇢ future. On the internet can be found many articles, which explain the rectilinear, circular and cyclical (linear) features of time (AND space).
Static Conceptions of Time and Space
The static view on the time, often referred to as "Absolutism with Respect to Time", was developed by Plato, Newton, and many other proponents of this static view of the time (and space). In physics, the time is operationally defined as "what an instrument or any means for measuring time tells about passing of time". Anyway, the best known static conception of time and space was developed by Isaac Newton (1643-1727), and it was dominant in the 18th and 19th centuries. In this Newton's conception, the time is absolute, independent of any perceiver (who merely occupies time) and it is the same everywhere in the universe (that means "static"). According to him, this absolute time is imperceptible and could only be understood mathematically. As a result of this, people are only capable of perceiving relative time, which is, in fact, a (mathematical) measurement of perceivable external objects in motion
- [like the phases of the Moon, the apparent motion of the Sun across the sky, the swing of pendulum as well as navigation by the apparent staticity of stars in a broader and deeper sense].
From these external movements and the similar inner motions (the beat of a heart, for example), the passage of time was inferred.
This static conception describes time metaphorically as an empty container into which events may be placed. In other words, this container exists passively, that is, independently of whether or not anything is placed in it. In short, Newton did for time what Euclid in antique age did for space, that is, he transformed and idealized it into an exactly measurable dimension. According to this conception of the time AND space, the spatial distances between bodies were RELATIVE, but space itself was ABSOLUTE. In other words, inhabitants of this universe shared the same public space and the same public time. We talk of so many centimeters, meters or kilometers from one place to another, of so many seconds, minutes or hours from one occurrence to another, and our lives are regulated within the quantifiable domains of public space and public time. This is the world of common sense we live in, bounded by the capabilities of the five basic senses, that accommodates the furniture of the biological and social sciences as well as of the classical physics.
Dynamic Conceptions of Time and Space
While in static conceptions of time and space, time is absolute in the sense that the time of an event is independent of the observer, in the dynamic conceptions of time and space it depends on the reference frame of the observer. The for-runners of this dynamic nature of time argued that time is merely a convenient intellectual concept, which is used by people to understand events. From this follows that time was useless unless objects in space exist to interact with, and this concept was called relational time (and space). Or more simply said, time nothing but the order of successive events; space is nothing but an order of co-existent objects; but the point is in acknowledging and experiencing their interaction. For example, Descartes, Locke, and Hume argued that thy mind needs to acknowledge time, in order to be understood what time is. Immanuel Kant goes even further by claiming that "we can not know what something is unless we experience it firsthand". In the Critique of Pure Reason (1781), he described time as a priory intuition [the purest possible schema of a purest concept] that allows people to comprehend sense experience [together with the other a priory intuition: space]. According to him, neither space nor time are conceived as substances, but rather are fundamental elements of an abstract mental (conceptual) framework (together with numbers) that necessarily structures the experiences of any rational agent, or observing subject.
Although it might be argued that some ideas of the dynamic (relational) conception of time, or of the dialectical one, if you so will, were proposed by Aristotle (“neither does time exist without change”), the more distinct ideas of this conception of time were developed by Leibnitz, Huygens, Berkeley, Mach, Hinton, Michelson, Morley, Lorenz, Poincare and many others. Apart from the Michelson-Morley's experiment, in particular, the incompatibility of the laws of electric and magnetic forces with previous understanding of the notions of space and time, described by Maxwell's equitations, gave to Einstein a hint how to develop his theory of relativity. In either case, it was Albert Einstein, who expanded and refined the idea of relative motion, and then molded this relational understanding of time and space by initiating dialectical processes of creating a cluster of fruitful stars [greatest inventors and inventions of this galaxy], which (actually still) rotate around the galactic core of his basic ideas of this dynamic conception of time and space. In short, it managed to him to put himself in the core of this "relational galaxy” in the similar way as it did Isaac Newton two centuries earlier, who actually reinterpreted Galileo Galilei's (1564-1642) concept of "relativity" in the absolute (static) sense. In other words, their basic (theoretical) ideas ignited the (creative processes of the) industry and space revolution of the 19th and 20th century
Albert Einstein, in his Theory of Relativity, overturned long-held ideas about the nature of time as a steady, continuous progression of events from past to present to future. As a consequence of this way of understanding the time and space, the Newtonian idea of absolute time and space has been superseded by the notion of time as one dimension of space-time in special theory of relativity (1905), and of dynamically curved space-time in the general theory of relativity (1916). Basic postulates of the Theory of Relativity are:
- There is no "absolute" frame of reference, and therefore time is not absolute. In short, this concept of time depends on the spatial frame of reference of the observer, observer's perception of time, as well as how it is (personally) experienced by this particular observer. Or put it in another way, simultaneity (of happenings) in time and space is relative, and for this reason, time and space are relative too;
- Time does not progress at the same rate for everyone, everywhere. The rate at which time flows depends upon where thou art located as well as how fast thou art traveling. As a result of this, the measurement of time by clocks are different for observers in relative motion. In general, the faster an object travels, the more slowly time passes for that object, as measured by a stationary observer;
- The speed of light is absolute and invariable, that is, it is the same within a vacuum (299,792 kilometers per second) for all (inertial) observers, no matter the speed at which an observer travels, who measures it or how fast this person measure it. On the other hand, in this relativistic understanding of space and time, lengths and distances depend on who measures them;
- In special) theory of relativity no material object can be accelerated to light speed, and consequently travel faster than light, which is already moving (through vacuum) at light speed. In other words, photons, that is, the light itself, reached limits of the physical laws: zero distance at zero time, respectively, here the word goes about a manifestation of stopping the time, understood from the point of view of the special theory of relativity. In short, an object that has nonzero rest mass [although contains a certain amount of energy] cannot move through vacuum at the speed of light because the consequence of it would be its increase in inertial mass to infinity. Or put it in another way, the amount of energy required to move it any faster will also be infinite, that is, beyond boundaries of the operation of known physical laws. As a result of this physical absoluteness, in full compliance with the special theory of relativity the speed of light is, for this reason, more fundamental than either time and space because both of them must be relative and flexible in order to satisfy this essential axiom of the special theory of relativity;
- The previously described topic of the increase in inertial mass is part of a more general phenomenon, known as the relativistic equivalence of mass and energy. In short, by adding energy to a material object, its mass automatically increases, and vice versa. Energy, mass and the speed of light are inextricably interlinked by Einstein's famous formula. Every object of mass 'm' will necessarily have total energy: E=mc**2, where the constant 'c' is the speed of light;
- In the general theory of relativity, Albert Einstein also introduced his understanding of gravity. In short, he presented and explained gravity not as a force but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime, which is, in fact, caused by the uneven distribution of energy and mass (space) in time.
Theory of Relativity
In the theory of Relativity, which is, by the way, the most famous scientific concept in physics of the 20th century, time is considered as a fourth dimension, on an EQUAL footing with the (Euclidean) three dimensions of space
- [the dialect-matter, in the dialectical way of understanding the space],
where the past and the future, as well as the present, all exist equally. Or put it in another way, to be distinctly specified occurrence of an event, time as a fourth coordinate is required, along with three spatial coordinates (height, width, and length). In full agreement with the Relativity theory, space and time are not independent of each other but make up a space-time continuum (of instants) because they are woven together. This implies that time is gap-free and not discrete. In this new public domain, the spacetime is constructed in such a way that the distance traveled by light rays is always zero. In short, in this conception of time and space, the laws of physics are the same for all non-accelerating observers. Although, Einstein did not explicitly rejected the existence of time, but influenced by the way on which time acts (and "passes") in the worlds of elementary (sub-) particles (micro-universe), he rejected the distinction between past, present, and future. As a result of this way of understanding the time (and space), time does not "flow" (it only appears so) but it just "is". As Einstein himself emphasized:
- "People like us, who believe in physics, know that the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion".
Because the speed of light is always the same (in a vacuum), in Einstein's theory of (special) relativity, it means that a traveler going very fast relative to the Earth will measure the passage of time slower than an Earthbound observer will. In other words, time slows down for this traveler through time and space, a phenomenon called time dilation. This relativistic effect of time slowing down is insignificant and very hardly perceivable, because happenings in the everyday life and corresponding motions are extremely slow, compared to the speed of light
- [and for this reason, the relativistic deviations from the all classical ways of understandings of the space and time are correspondingly small, and thus negligible (the realm of the five basic senses: a scope of space dia the suitable span of time understood in terms of dialectical interactive approach)],
but it becomes very pronounced at speeds approaching that of light. In Einstein's theory of general relativity, time dilation effect describes a difference of elapsed time between two events, measured by observers that are either moving relative to each other, or differently, depending on their proximity to a source of gravity. Theory of general relativity, posits that gravity of a massive body [such as, for example, the mass of a black hole, star, planet,...] distorts and warps the space-time around it, causing the flow of time to speed up or slow down depending on its distance from the formed source of gravity. Basically, in general theory of relativity, Einstein managed to reconcile relativity and gravitation by discarding the traditional view on (physical) world, which saw time and space as merely a stage on which the events of the everyday life unfold.
In essence, in full compliance with the theory of relativity, as the faster is traveled (and the speed of light approached) as more the (experience of) time is affected. This shows that the time is relative and not absolute because in full agreement with this dynamic (relational) conception of time and space whether an object is at rest or in motion depends on the frame of reference of observer (her, his point of view). As a result of this way of understanding the time, someone in a parked vehicle is in a different frame of reference in comparison with someone in a vehicle traveling at a constant speed.
- Although it appears that this driver sits still in the parked vehicle (in relation to Earth), he travels, relative to the Sun, through space (in time) very fast (the concept of relative motion) because the Earth is traveling at 107,000 kilometers an hour around the Sun [in fact, both drivers are traveling with this additional velocity], as well as the Sun rotates around the core of Milky Way. In addition to this, to get a more authentic and trustworthy picture of this dialectical understanding of the universe, keep in mind that our galaxy also rotates within the local cluster of galaxies and so on in these changeable (not only dynamic) worlds of dialectics in a dialectically long-run. As a result of this dialectical way of understanding the time dia space, a clear distinction between and among the observable universe, (potentially) reachable universe, accessible universe (from the point of view of common sense of a human being), and the currently accessible universe is made. More about it will be said later.
Hermann Minkowski (1908), a former professor of Einstein, showed that time and space, as a result of Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, is actually fused together into a single four-dimensional continuum (of the space-time). SPACETIME (continuum) is the new public domain, where people share the same spacetime
- [that is, in the theory of relativity, the spacetime is absolute as a counterpart to the Newtonian understanding of the absolute space and time]
but not the same space and time [because in this conception neither time nor space is absolute but relative].
- In this way, seen from the dialectical point of view, as it will be later more thoroughly elaborated, the mega-dialect time was reduced to become effectively just part of a coordinate specifying an object's position in this dynamical interpretation of space-time.
The presented Einstein’s special theory of relativity (1905) with its speed limit of light works locally but not globally. In general theory of relativity (1915, 1916), the concept of space-time was further refined, when Einstein realized that perhaps gravity is not a field or force, but a feature of spacetime itself. For this reason, the space-time continuum is actually warped and curved by mass and energy, a warping that it is thought of and experienced as gravity, resulting in a continually curved spacetime. In other words, distant as well as local matter produce curvature and distortion of spacetime, because everything is attracted to everything else by this source of gravity. This understanding of the gravity, as an attractive force, acts in effect in this model, as negative energy, causing the reaction of the curvature of space-time. In this way, the spacetime becomes, in general theory of relativity, an active participant in the physical universe, where both energy and mass are affected by this source of the gravity.
As a consequence of this, the curved space permeated and saturated with energy, and hence clothed in intangible mass, is itself a source of further curvature. This SELF-INTERACTION OF SPACE is the essence of the general theory of relativity. The concept of the self-interaction of space is often illustrated by the image of a rubber sheet distorted by the weight of a bowling ball. If another object (with a mass) tries to move in a straight line on this curved surface its attempts will now end up following a curved trajectory. Seen from the perspective of Newton's understanding of time and space, such (an elliptic) movement was due to the force of gravity in action. On the other hand, Einstein's response would be that this motion is the result of free-falling this object through the curved (and distorted) spacetime. Personally, I am impressed by this pictorial way of representation and interpretation of this source of gravity but it says nothing new in comparison to what already Newton said, that is, there is a source of this secret force that holds and does not allow setting free this object from the curved spacetime. Keep in mind, a supernatural manifestation of this secret source of "gravity" can also act as a repelling force, causing that the recession velocities are infinitely great and independent of the speed of light. As a consequence of this phenomenon, galaxies are separating and flying apart from each other.
But do not be misled by the plausible and self-persuasive convincing of this simple-reasonable explanation of this secret source and manifestation of gravity, because the real power of Einstein's understanding of gravity (1916), as a part of this dynamic conception of space and time, is that this curved spacetime can be used for traveling through outer space without consuming additional fuel for doing it by simply exploiting this way of understanding this source of gravity (in terms of how space (-time self-) interacts). On the other hand, for Newton (1643-1727) was not (technologically) feasible to think about it in this way in the year 1687 when he published this law of gravity, seen from the point of view of the development of culture (dia RELIGION), philosophy, art, and science. For your proper orientation in time dia space, the Italian astronomer and physicists Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), who died one year before the birth of Isaac Newton, escaped the death sentence for the support of Heliocentrism at the price to recant it (forced by the Inquisition). In short, the concept of heliocentrism is based on the astronomical model of Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543), and was published right before [or, as some others argue after] his death (1543). In this model, the Earth revolves around the Sun and not the inverse. For this reason, to the opinion of Copernicus, the Earth is not (at) the center of the universe [geocentric model of Claudius Ptolemy (100-170)]. But the point of these real happenings understood in terms of your proper orientation in time dia space is that for this heresy Galileo Galilei spent the rest of his life under house arrest. It seems, forces of the Inquisition, after a relatively short period of opening the windows for creative exploration (freedom of creative acting), manage each time to close it sooner or later, as a result of the alternating (ping-pong) swaying back and forth by the teeter between these forces of extremism ["two sides" of the same coin] in the sense of bipolar (or-or) dia binary [or] way of thinking.
Dialectical Conception of Time and Space
The dialectical understanding of time, as it is based on the individual, human way of thinking, encompasses all the essential features of the static and dynamic conception of time and space and is in full agreement with the understanding of these complex dialectical contents by the common sense (of human beings). As a result of this dialectical understanding of time and space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter), validity of the aforementioned static and dynamic conceptions of the time and space is not interpreted in this dialectical context in terms of the bipolar (OR - OR) DIA binary (OR) way of thinking. In short, dialectical understanding of time and space in full agreement with this methodological approach (dialectical interactive approach), in fact, complements and supplements the Newtonian and Einstein's understanding of space and time. In short, the Newtonian static understanding of space and time is still valid in the usefull realm of the five basic senses. But as it is moved away from this realm to the enormous vastness of the universe as more grow (accumulate) deviations of this (recti)linear understanding of time and space compared to the dialectical reality. In other words, there is more and more need for a dynamic understanding of time and space, such as for example, the Theory of Relativity of Einstein to be applicable in this much wider range of circumstances and conditions. But sooner or later, even this powerful conception of time and space cannot keep the step with the pace of dialectical changes in this vastness of the eternity of times dia infinity of spaces. In short, these dialectical transformations, metamorphoses, annihilations and annulments cannot be simply added, subtracted, multiplied, divided.... and solved by means of the static dia dynamic (quantitative) mathematics.
Source: Proposal for a Potential Ph.D. Dissertation at the Copenhagen Business School, Denmark:
In this conception of the dialectical understanding of time and space, the mega-dialect TIME was redefined and presented as it follows:
- future (within thee),
- emotively emotional dia physical PRESENCE (the medium of time),
- past (around thee),
while the mega-dialect SPACE consists of the following dialects:
- mind dia reason (the medium of space),
- matter (materia),
In this dialectical comprehension of space, the mega - dialect space was completely redefined, and in this interpretation of (the meaning of) space was presented as the dialectical interplay between and among the spirit, mind dia reason, matter because only in this way (their and) its subsistence, understood in terms of the dialectical unity of theirs can be created, and then continuously maintained in a dialectically long-run. In other words, the mega-dialect space is only an interactively creative dialect (part and piece) of a much broader concept of the spatial infinity (DIA eternity of times). In short, contrary to the static and dynamic understanding of space and time, in this dialectical conception of space and time, the space is not only passively observed and measured, as well as understood in terms of self-interaction of this external physical (three-dimensional) expanse of the space-time, which is dried off, not only of the spirit but also of the mind dia reason. Basically, seen from the perspective of this dialectical understanding of time dia space, the previously considered static and dynamic comprehending of space and time, actually takes place in two dialects ("modules") of this dialectical conception of time and space:
- Space in Time (matter embedded in the past: the HERE and NOW),
- Time in Space (future embedded in spirit: NOW and THERE).
In fact, the entire dynamic content of the previously thoroughly explained events in the four-dimensional reality (of Einstein’s theory of relativity) can be placed in only one dialect of the listed ones. I guess, you know which one is most suitable for it: Space in Time. In short, two observers (stationary and traveling one) can be seen as two "modules" of Space in Time, separated by a gap of the space and time, where each of them passively observes one another from the own location in space and time, understood in terms of the instant of "the now and here". In effect, this gap of time "dia VERSUS and space", which lies between these two embedded and captured "Spaces in Time ("modules")
- [a barrier, which has to be overcome in the rectilinear sense versus the dialectical way of understanding this topic under creative reconsideration and reexamination]
is the main cause and source of all previously discussed deviations in the measurement of time and space. Pay thy attention to the fact that already in this simple "module" of the encapsulated time and space but a dialectical one [a Space in Time-like half of the "Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in Time DIA Space"], of course, by interpreting this in an appropriate way of thinking, were included all relevant parameters for the orientation in this dynamic (relative) understanding of space and time:
[The Four-Dimensional Reality of] Einstein's Theory of Relativity
1) the three physical dimensions of space [the dialect - matter],
2) the past
- [this is a proper enough understanding of time as its fourth dimension because in full agreement with this dynamic conception of time and space the distinction between past, present, and future is rejected by Einstein, as well as their physical presence, is in the external sense (from all sides) surrounded by the past (events)],
3) the observers [understood in the sense of the physical presence of theirs],
as well as the not explicitly mentioned
4) mental (intellectual) framework [the dialect - reason] by Einstein ("the fifth dimension"),
otherwise without some form of manifestation of reasoning, that is, without some mental way of processing their observation, perception, and experience of each other, as well as without the multitude of external observers (any one of you), this dynamic model of reality cannot (properly) function. As an example, just consider all the complexity of the following Einstein's conclusion, which can not even be imagined, let alone derived from a three-dimensional physical space fused with Einstein's understanding of time as the fourth dimension of his model of reality, where the past and the future, as well as the present, all exist equally, accordingly "time does not flow (it only appears so) but it just is":
- Time does not progress at the same rate for everyone, everywhere. The rate at which time flows depends upon where thou art located as well as how fast thou art traveling. As a result of this, the measurement of time by clocks are different for observers in relative motion. In general, the faster an object travels, the more slowly time passes for that object, as measured by a stationary observer.
In short, although this Einstein's extremely simplified model of reality is not entirely consistent seen from a methodological point of view, Einstein indirectly suggested or implicitly assumed the existence of this mental (intellectual) framework by using the concept of (different) frames of reference. In other words, in his dynamic (relative) conception of time and space:
- There is no absolute frame of reference, and therefore time is not absolute. In short, this concept of time depends on the spatial frame of reference of an observer, observer's perception of time, as well as how it is (personally) experienced by this observer" (the FIRST Basic postulate of Theory of Relativity).
Or, said it in another way, seen from the perspective of the dialectical understanding of space (and time), this dynamic model of reality, consists of a mathematically expressible module (four dimensional reality)
- [(triangle of the) Space in Time: the three physical dimensions of this dynamic (relative) understanding of space, which is embedded in the past (the matter dia past)],
and a kind of the dynamic (relative) medium of the space (reason) and time (their physical presence), which are represented in this illustrative figure by two right-angled triangles. Although, this dialectical content as a whole can be quantified
- [especially the dialectical content of this dynamic (relative) medium of the time: the physical presence],
these non-physical (mental) aspects and properties of the (social) physical universe are not (in the same way so easily) mathematically expressible. And probably, for this reason, it was way apart, respectively this scientific content was considered in the developed concept of the physical universe as (distant) objects out there of this four dimensional (physical) reality, which is in the focus of this (scientific) way of considering this complex creative content. Recall, the right-angled triangles are a typical feature of the static (binary) and dynamic (quantitative) mathematics in action.
- Pay thy attention that this Space in Time-like half of the Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in Time DIA Space in the hidden knowledge, on which this methodological approach is based, when considered autonomously and separately from the corresponding Time in Space-like half of the Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in Time DIA Space, also represented the lifeless (dead) physical worlds (of dialectic: still life). More about "these happenings after the death of a living being" will be said in the following chapters.
This creator of knowledge hopes that now everyone understands how and in which way the dialectical conception of time and space complements and supplements the Newton's and Einstein's understanding of space and time rather than the widely spread negating it in the well-known bipolar (or-or) dia the appropriate binary (or) way of thinking and (the corresponding way of creative) acting. Keep in mind, unlike me they had not at their creative disposal such a powerful methodological framework but had to use (much more inferior) methodological frameworks, which were available in those days. Or, to say it otherwise, the application of the right methodological creative framework is already a half of the knowledge creating.
While you were (made) busy with the mental processing and digesting of perceived, observed, and experienced events in time and space of the stationary and traveling observers (of each other), it will be utilized this opportunity by me, as the next step, to simplify further this artificially made complexity of understanding these very simple (recti) linear events within the dynamic (relativistic) understanding of time and space
- [a two-way approach, without manifesting some kind of (dialectical) change, starting with a trivial one, such as, for example, the death of observer or traveler, or both of them: the dialectical transition and transformation of the Space in Time into Time in Space.
Abstract Methodological Creative Framework of the Dialectical Interactive Approach: Four Key Concepts of the Dialectical Understanding of Time and Space, expressed through its Two Paired Dialects: Time in Space ⇄ Space in Time DIA Medium of Time ⇄ Medium of Space
For all these reasons, in my opinion, the better way is that each of these two participants [stationary and the moving Space in Time: the HERE and NOW] in this mental experiment considers actions of each other as a (distant) Time in Space: NOW and THERE. Although, the medium of time [emotively emotional dia physical presence] DIA the corresponding medium of space [mind dia reason] was automatically incorporated, that is, (re) generated by this inclusion of the second "invisible half" of the Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in Time DIA Space with the sense of sight, the point of this dialectical understanding of time and space is at the first place in the dialectical interaction of these four key-dialects, understood also in terms of their dialectical unity dia the oneness of theirs. Or uttered it in terms of this applied methodological approach (dialectical interactive approach), by transformation of the four elements (fire, earth, air, water) into various forms of stars will be initiated corresponding dia-processes, the purpose of which is an pictorial presentation and explanation as well as a deeper elaboration of these complex dia-processes as a continuous dialectical interplay of these four dialects: Time in Space ⇄ Space in Time ⊠ Medium of Time ⇄ Medium of Space.
Or, to say it otherwise, for an external interpretation of this complex creatively interactive dialectical content (both inner and external one), on the basis of this ground plan of a pyramid should be constructed a replica of the real (Cheops') pyramid, or to be visited in order to comprehend the full meaning of this dialectical understanding of time and space [in a familiar and understandable way to the majority of people]. Or it can be much cheaper done virtually by a computer simulation, or even simpler imaginary by pulling the middle of this ground plan of the pyramid (marked by "0") to up in order to form the representation of this pyramid in thy mind dia reason. Regardless of the option, which was chosen by thee, in this dialectical understanding of time and space, comprehended in the sense of appropriate interpretation of the perceived content (by the five basic senses) in interaction with the (innerly) experienced dialectical content within the created medium of time dia the corresponding medium of space to be it EXTERNALLY expounded, the future is experienced as something beyond the (left) corner of this pyramid,
- [the location of heart (left side) in a human body, that is, the future was experienced endlessly remote like a feeling in the physical sense]
that is, it is out there of the realm of five basic senses, while the past is experienced as something behind the (right) corner of this pyramid of encapsulated time and space. In other words, the past appears much closer [close as thought in the physical sense], also understood in terms of this external reinterpretation and translation of the dialectical understanding of time and space in the (linear) sense of comprehending this space and time, which is a much more understandable to the majority of people.
Because the proper perception and experience of this dialectical content is culturally sensitive, in order to be in-seen and experienced it on (approximately) the same way by an observer, grown up in a Semitic culture, this illustration of the "Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in Time DIA Space" should be flipped horizontally. By using this analogy, this illustrative diagram should be adequately flipped if one perceives and experiences this dialectical content in the sense of the down to up, up to down, diagonal, or in any other rectilinear way of presenting this dialectical content [in the mind dia reason]. But this "flipping" is, in fact, necessary for a proper dialectical understanding of time and space on the first place because in this dialectical view "With respect to Time", the mega dialect - time starts with the dialect - future (within thee),
- [that is, it also emanates from this inner eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces, and not exclusively through understanding this dialectical content in the external sense: the point is in their interactively creative interplay]
emotively emotional presence dia physical presence (of body), past instead of the rectilinear representation of the flow of time in the sense of the past ⇢ present ⇢ future. More about it will be said in the creative article: Arrow of Time. Notice, in spite of the fact that dialectical way of thinking, in general, can be externally represented in the most approximate linear way by using a spiral form, its physical construction, and especially the appropriate mental processing, presentation, explaining, elaboration, and conjuring it up in an understandable way is not so simple. It seems that the drilled mind dia reason (reasoning of this dialectical content) in this (recti) linear way from generation to generation is simply not able to process and digest it. But for truly ambitious ones, there is no need to build such a spiral construction. To find an appropriate inspiration, just watch the image of any spiral galaxy.
In short, without some manifestation of the medium of time [emotively emotional dia physical presence], DIA the appropriate medium of space [mind dia reason], there is also no way to understand and explain anything (inner) in the external sense and vice verse. For this reason, to solve the dilemma whether space (and time) can be perceived without some way of manifestating the dialect-mind (dia reason), as well as to encompass these enormous inner vastnesses, in this pre-ancient understanding of time and space, the dialect-mind dia reason was included as the constituent part of the mega-dialect - space. It follows from this that the mega-dialect space is only slightly more understandable compared to the twin brother mega-dialect - time, just because their common interactively creative outcome, (outer) Space in Time (matter embedded in the past) is more easily perceivable (with the five basic senses), and for this reason, it is also more easily understood (by mind dia reason), and then externally explainable to others in comparison to the dialect Time in Space (future wrapped and hidden in the spirit).
Although one of you can argue that some constituent dialects in each known way of understanding of time and space do not have a mental framework for judgment, this dialectical content as a whole is not in-seen in the same way in this dialectical understanding of time and space. In short, wherever the primary law of the dialectic in action was perceived, characterized by following the aforementioned fundamental methodical pattern of the dialectical interactive approach, for example, manifested and experienced in the daily life in the sense of .... birth ⇢ life (dia living) ⇢ death ⇢ rebirth ...., a certain manifestation of the mental framework is already present there. Examples and manifestations of it are also the life cycle of a star, galaxy, or even a life cycle of the elementary (sub-) particle within dialectical worlds of the micro-universe. In general, seen from the perspective of this dialectical methodological approach (to the unknown), where the dialects – spirit and matter are present, and interactive creatively encountered in this dialectical way with each other, some manifestation of the dialect – mind (dia reason) will be manifested, in one or another way.
Inner Aspects of the Time in Space DIA Space in Time
In this dialectical way of understanding time, the PRESENT (TIME) was replaced by the dialect - physical presence (of a body) DIA emotively emotional presence. Here the first dialect speaks of someone's active (physical) DIA creative presence, understood in the sense of SPACE IN TIME (matter embedded in the past), whereas the second dialect speaks of emotively emotional presence of some dialectical content in thy mind dia the reason, understood in terms of the TIME IN SPACE (future wrapped and hidden in the spirit). The dialect - SPACE IN TIME actually presents the memorized and recorded contents of the past as well as the dialectical worlds around me ⇄ thee ⇄ us, which I ⇄ thou ⇄ we can perceive with the five basic human senses: Nose (the sense of smell), eyes (the sense of sight), mouth (the sense of taste), ears (the sense of hearing) and skin (the sense of touch). In other words, these dialectical worlds are physical (material) nature, and they surround my ⇄ thy ⇄ our physical presence. Indeed, I ⇄ thou ⇄ we are only (cap) able to perceive the utmost (creative) results of the SPACE IN TIME
- [matter embedded in the past, that is, the physical (matter-like creative) after-effects of the past events, which are perceivable with five basic senses],
but not the past itself. On the other hand, the dialect - TIME IN SPACE (future dia spirit) actually encompasses the outer, (very) remote, and unknown worlds of dialectics, as well as the inner (hidden) dialectical worlds within me ⇄ thee ⇄ us, which I ⇄ thou ⇄ we only can sense with the two typical human senses: The sixth sense (the sense of presentiment: intuition) and the seventh sense [the emotively emotional sense of inner feeling of self], understood in terms of emotively emotional presence within these vast INNER expanses of (the OWN) time DIA space. The dialect - Time in Space can be also imagined as a manifestation of inner "frame-medium" for coming into being of ideas and thoughts DIA recording, memorizing, and keeping them there, which can remain unknown in the external sense [of this dialectical understanding of (the outer) Space in Time: matter embedded in the past].
- It is very hard to find the right notion and appropriate words in order to precisely express this dialectical content under creative consideration (inner "frame-medium"). In my opinion, all great thinkers were confronted with this creative challenge during the development of their theoretical conceptions, particularly when trying to explain and elaborate an unknown dialectical content of the time, in time dia space. For example, by reflecting Newtonian understanding of time and space through the prism of this (from now known) methodological approach (dialectical interactive approach), it is now more understandable [in the similar way, as some aspects of Einstein's theory of relativity were previously methodologically reexamined] what Newton wanted to say by his "absolute" understanding of time and space (and not only what he wrote).
- Particularly, in my personal opinion, not in the way, how it was reinterpreted after his death ("dead mouth can not speak and reinterpret it in terms of words and notions of the new Ages"], (also) understood in terms of a further (and further) merging and fusing akin minds. In short, their in-proficiency, understood in the spiritual and mindual sense, as well as the aforementioned underdevelopment of the language in general, is often utilized for various ways of simple-reasonable philosophizing of the topic under creative consideration and reexamination. For this reason, try to sense and feel what was wanted to be said by using thy sixth and seventh sense [by reading also between and among rows (of written sentences), columns, and diagonals (of the inexpressible thoughts)], instead of directing the power of your five basic (scientific) senses to what was noted down in this (already remote) time [future, EMOTIVELY emotional dia physical presence, past] dia space [SPIRIT, mind dia reason, matter].
Or more simply said, these inner, hidden dialectical contents can not be perceived with the five basic senses (in a proper way). For example, thou have an idea for a new project (Time in Space), but since thou have already promised members of thy family a two-month trip around the world, the externalization of this idea in terms of Space in Time was postponed (DELAYED) because it is impossible to be physically present at once on two different places, although thy ideas of the project WILL CONTINUE EMOTIVELY emotionally to be present during thy family trip. Notice, within thy own inner spaces (individual way of thinking) in the moment of birth of thy great idea [NOW DIA (T)HERE: the inner present] time continues to run, but not understood in the sense of past ⇢ present ⇢ future but rather, it seems that thy great idea comes from this (inner, unknown) future (within thee) to the presence (its birth), which is then innerly transformed into the past (the instance of its placing within thy inner spaces: its memorizing). On the other hand, within the realm of the external present (time) (the realm of the five basic senses), because of being still inside of thy head
- [it has not yet been externally manifested even with words so that it would be conveyed, heard, and recorded with the sense of hearing],
the (outer) public space and time (for the crowd dia groups) continues to flow in the sense of past ⇢ present ⇢ future without thy great idea, as well as without to be perceived in the outer sense (of the Space in Time).
Only in the case of a (FRUITFUL) physical externalization (materialization, actualization, realization) of thy (INNER) Time in Space [which still keeps thy great idea] by a further transition and transformation of it into (matter embedded in] the (outward) past (Space in Time), this until then (unknown, internal ⇢ external) "future" will be recorded in terms of well-known the HERE AND NOW [that is, it will become externally, publicly present]. In other words, without some form of the externalization of thy great idea there is neither past nor present nor future for it within this public outer understanding of time and space. Or put it in another way, if thou, for example, died during the family trip, only in case if it was previously externalized with thy words (suitable for the sense of hearing) to members of thy family, friends...., or if it was written on paper (suitable for the sense of sight), there is a potential opportunity (and future) for thy great idea. In other words, there is a possibility to be accomplished by others [its FURTHER DELAY (postponement) within this dialectical understanding of time and space]. By summing up the all previously mentioned, generally speaking, in full agreement with the higher knowledge, the dialect - Time in Space represents unknown, distant, hidden, invisible .... dialectical contents of time and space [which are not (properly) perceivable with the five basic senses]. I hope, it managed me to conjure up the meaning of this internal key-dialect (Time in Space) and of its external counter-dialect (Space in Time) in this constellation of the dialectical way of understanding the time and space, understood in terms of dialectical interactively creative interplay of the own (internal) and the public (external) time DIA the appropriate space. Turn the attention to the fact that both internal and external time DIA space continuously continue to flow [within the medium of time DIA the appropriate spatial medium] regardless of the previously mentioned (sporadic) happenings within the Time in Space DIA Space in Time.
II. Puzzle of Time and Space: Aftereffects of the Dialectical Understanding of Time and Space
Aftereffects of the Exclusion of Dialects-Spirit and Mind from the Scientific Models of Reality
(Recti) Linear Creative Framework for the Orientation in Time and Space
After this thorough reconsideration of such a complex dialectical content as it is the puzzle of time and space in the first part of this creative article, I hope you could draw the right conclusion from these three complementary conceptions of time and space. By the way, these dialectical aspects of the time and space will be additionally elaborated in the rest of this creative article. Just to mention, to properly function this dialectical understanding of time and space in terms of applied methodology (dialectical interactive approach), inner spaces were also included in this dialectical conception of time and space. In short, this dialectical content was not seen as an internal room of the merged mind and spirit, understood in the sense of some kind of merging and fusing the mind and spirit. In other words, the previously more thoroughly reconsidered three-dimensional physical space (the dialect - matter) was expanded with the set free dialect - spirit in order to be re-created a medium of space (the dialect - mind dia reason). In this way were encompassed and spanned these enormous unknown outer and inner vastnesses of time DIA the appropriate space, understood in terms of emotively emotional presence within them (NOW and THERE), seen from the perspective of thy physical presence (of the body: the HERE and NOW).
In this dialectical methodological context, the dialect - spirit was used in the metaphysical and figurative sense to refer to the unknown, puzzling, (outer and) inner (non-physical) expanses of the mega-dialect space, understood in the sense of Time in Space (NOW and THERE), which are from the dialectical point of view unpredictable, invisible and imperceivable to the five basic senses [of the physical worlds understood in terms of the Space in Time (HERE and NOW)]. The above reconsideration of Einstein's theory of relativity by reflecting it through the prism of dialectical interactive approach shows that scientific attempts to get rid of the dialect - spirit, as a part of a much broader process of the dechristianization and infidelization of science [as their response to the scientific and creative happenings during the medieval Age of Blackness], as well as their efforts to exclude mathematically inexpressible aspects of mind (dia reason), is not that easy and so simple as they thought. Or to say otherwise, these simple-reasonable actions and their corresponding efforts have led to over-simplification of [scientific, and especially social and living] reality,
- [where ordinary people too, as some kind of captives of this (relativistic) dynamic understanding of relations and affairs in the created physical universe, are also reduced to the "things referred to"].
For further implications of this way of thinking, understood in terms of applying it in the social, business, and life reality, READ: The (Recti)linear Comprehending of Space and Time: The Conception of the Physical Universe.
Phenomena and Optical Illusions of the Rectilinear Understanding of Time AND Space
(Recti)linear Creative Framework for the Orientation in Time AND Space, as a Source of Ideas for the Bipolar (OR-OR) Way of Thinking: Mind - Matter, All - Nothing, Yes - No, 0 -1 ....
On the other hand, consequences of the dis-integrity of the dialect - (physical AND emotively emotional) presence, understood in the dialectical sense of the ability to be spiritually present somewhere outside the physical presence of the body within the spatial MEDIUM - mind dia reason, but perceived with the five basic senses, and afterward translated, reinterpreted and comprehended in terms of the rectilinear understanding of time AND space, are various manifestations of DEVIATIONS AND PHENOMENA of the Time in Space (future in spirit: NOW AND THERE) DIA Space in Time (matter embedded in the past: THE NOW AND HERE). These phenomena of the rectilinear understanding of time and space observed and recorded both in the realm of five basic senses [during a video conferencing on long distance, for example] as well as in the realm of macro-universe. As an example of looking backward in time, we see the Sun (Space in Time: matter embedded in the past) with the sense of sight how it looked out (the now and here on the Earth) for eight minutes ago, and not how it exactly looks out NOW and THERE (in the Sun: the invisible Time in Space) at that moment. Concisely, here the word goes about another (inverse) form of the previously considered delay of Time in Space DIA Space in Time, as a consequence of the limit of speed of light.
In short, all these known and unknown deviations and phenomena of the time "AND versus DIA" space, including the related optical illusions, are in fact consequences of the rendering (translation of) these complex dialectical processes, understood in terms of re-interpretation of them in the (recti)linear sense: (over)simplification DIA (recti) linearization of these complex dialectical contents with the (abilities of) sense of sight that is constrained by the EXTERNAL (limit of the speed of) light. On the other hand, the use(fullness), appliance and relevance of other four basic senses within the realm of the present decreases with increasing physical distance between bodies (objects) of the Space in Time (sense of hearing and smell), whilst the sense of taste and touch are completely useless even on a tiny physical distance of Space in Time (matter embedded in the past). Hope, there is no need to be stressed that these four senses are entirely useless in the realm of the macro-universe (in the vacuum, for example).
To my opinion, all these previously mentioned Phenomena and Optical Illusions of the Rectilinear Understanding of Time AND Space, as an implication of the too emphasized relaying on the illusionary power of five basic (scientific) senses, especially on the power, the related scope and reach of the sense of sight, are also present in the contemporary understanding of how the Universe works, as well as what is the future destiny or fate of the universe. For example, even in the most advanced dynamic conception of the universe, which is based on the dynamic (relative) understanding of time and space, developed by physicist Alexander Friedmann, all basic features of the (recti) linear way of thinking can be easily recognized. In short, Friedmann developed three different types of model of the universe.
- First, the universe would expand for a given amount of time, and if the expansion rate is less than the density of the universe (leading to gravitational attraction), it would ultimately lead to the collapse of the universe at a later stage.
- Secondly, the universe would expand, and at sometime if the expansion rate and the density of the universe become equal, it would expand slowly and stop at infinite time, leading to a somewhat static universe.
- Thirdly, the universe would continue to expand forever if the density of the universe is less than the critical amount required to balance the expansion rate of the universe (A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking, 1988).
Although, Friedmann managed to cross over the imaginary boundary of the number 2 by reaching the realm of number three
- [in this particular case, the three options were presented instead of usually two options of the bipolar dia binary way of thinking],
he did not manage to get rid of the typical traps of this way of thinking, understood in the sense of its deeply implanted shadow, which continues to follow him regardless in which realm (of numbers dia options) he moved. Despite the fact that I wrote a lot about the Capabilities of the Modern Mind seen from the Perspective of Creating Knowledge, the way, how this (scientific) kind of mind functions in the reality, does not stop to surprise me with always new ways of its manifestation. In other words, this dialectical content continues to puzzle me. In either case, it seems, to be some sort of captive of a concrete way of thinking, dressed in the appropriate paradigm [dynamic conception of space and time], or simply being a life-long loyal follower of the creator of this paradigm, they have not the necessary (creative) courage, triggered and driven with the force of their own creativity, to make the decisive paradigmatic shift in their way of thinking, in order to try to exceed the creative achievements of their role model (establisher of the school of thought). Just, try to imagine the (creative) consequences of this approach to the future course of events in the case that, for example, Albert Einstein, as the founder of the dynamic (relative) understanding of time and space, acted in this way. Or as it someone said, "the greatest reward for a master-teacher is when a disciple of his exceeds creative achievements of his (own) time dia space". But precisely here lies the power of a truly great individual. Either way, this clearly shows that it is not enough the quantitative increasing of listed options but there is a need for a qualitative shift in the way of thinking (paradigmatic shift). For example, if I were he, I would do this paradigmatic shift by proposing, for example,
- A fourth (malign) scenario in time dia the corresponding situation in space: a part of the universe was transformed into a singularity, as a result of the joint action of the gigantic black holes inside it. In other words, everything was swallowed by them, and now by this created hidden source of gravity has been attracting a new "food" for its further growth or existence, if you so will.
- A fifth (good-natured) scenario in time dia the corresponding situation in space: the universe reached the necessary stage of development and growth to begin with its replication dia division. For example, in an analogous way as a cell does. In other words, it was found a source for its further growing (expansion) otherwise this option will also finish in the contraction of it, or in creating an, even more, stronger singularity. Although scientists search for the so-called dark matter in the universe, it or a larger part of it can be stored in the primordial abyss too. In short, analogically as it was found a way to see the green color of the trees and plants (equivalent to color of light), (the color of) the soil, especially its deeper segments and layers (the hidden reservoirs of the dark matter), can be out of universe, from which, for example, black holes or dark holes with their roots could draw their (additional) nourishment using the concept of worm-holes in this purpose instead of using them as time machines.
- and so on in time dia space (by proposing new options for creative consideration and the related reexamination and discussion) until the temporary conclusion of the time (in time) dia the considered scope of space, was achieved.
Although these suggestions might be trivial, in each of them, a manifestation of the (dialectical) change was included, which by definition leads to a paradigmatic shift of the (previous, existing, dynamic) way of thinking. As a result of this paradigmatic shift in the way of thinking, these additional options can give a possible explanation, for example, how and why gravity, or more precisely said, an unprecedented source of gravitation can also act as a repulsive force. Or, to say it differently, this created (supernatural) source of the negative source of gravity simply overpowers the attractive force of the existing core, around which they (previously) rotated, as well as this might be also a result of the ("peaceful and free-will") replication of the universe (as a part of its life-cycle). As an example of this phenomenon, it is already observed that galaxies are separating and flying apart from one another. Basically, this additional view of the time dia space, as a final result of a dialectical change in action, can explain why the recession velocities are infinitely great and independent of the speed of light. In other words, the aforementioned fourth and fifth scenario in time dia the appropriate situation in space can be triggers, drivers and the locomotions of these already observed phenomena. Seen from the methodological point of view in general, from the description and (scientific) elaboration of the identified creative challenge in time dia space, this scientifically identified problem is not of a dynamic nature but rather of a dialectical one. For this reason, the quest for a solution of this creative challenge should be continued (in reflections of the universe) in these deep dialectical waters.
For thy orientation in this scientific (dynamic) understanding of time and space, the most acceptable explanation of this phenomenon is that this type of recession does not consist of the ordinary motion through a space limited by the speed of light but it occurs because of the expansion of space and time. Either way, in full agreement with the dialectical interactive approach, the aforementioned additional options should be understood in terms of the opening and corresponding re-enlightening of the mind by expanding thy horizons for more appropriate (and better) orientation in these creative vastness of (both outer and inner) time dia space. Or, to say it otherwise, this dialectical understanding of time and space, as well as each future developed one, is considered in this methodological approach as the temporary (creative) conclusion of time, in time dia space, [that is, it is valid until a better way or approach was developed and created]. As a result of this methodological approach to the discovery of the unknown in time dia space, this basic postulate of the dialectical interactive approach will outlast (and outlive) this presented dialectical conception of time and space.
As regards the future prospects of the dynamic (relative) conception of time and space, it has been already debatable from its introduction. In spite of it, it is still the most influential, widely accepted and used concept of time and space. Personally, I think that the dialectical understanding of time and space is more appropriate and applicable for solving of the creative challenges in life reality in general, especially of the social aspects of life because its understanding of time dia space (SPIRIT, MIND dia REASON, matter) is more suitable for achieving it as well as in those subjects under creative (re) consideration and reexamination, where quality properties are manifested in a significant extent and are in the focus of creative acting. Or said it differently, the application of basic postulates of the theory of relativity in the social sphere of this much broader (dialectical) societal universe is inappropriate, and not suitable in these complex, interwoven and for this reason, very complicated circumstances.
- For example, the application of its idea that "as the faster an object travels, the more slowly time passes for that object, as measured by a stationary observer", is very debatable, or unsustainable, in particular, when it is understood in the literal terms of the meaning this kind of faster movement through the societal (physical) universe. Or more simply, according to this relativistic understanding of time and space, this object ("referred to") much slower gets old compared to a stationary one [who sits still, longer sleeps, less works and more enjoys charms of such a life]. In other words, such an object exposed to the continuously increased pace of interconnected social, working, family, personal activities and obligations, that is, to a continual pressure to work faster and faster on the working place, to travel faster and faster in order to overcome the longer and longer distances from the home to the place of work, to more quickly and quickly deliver children in the kinder garden, school, to faster and faster do shoppings and prepare the food (for members of the family, guests...), to faster and faster fulfill other social activities, marital obligations, personal needs and satisfactions, and so on and on....
- For some of them, if these social and family activities and obligations were compounded they would already exceeded the existing maximal speed of movement through the vacuum (space). In other words, they should be much younger, according to this basic postulate of the theory of relativity, than they are in (this living) reality. Have you ever met such a person? Rather, it might be argued that they are worn out in a much greater extent than a privileged "stationary" one. Or put it in another way, it seems, it does not matter, what both staticity (stationary observer) and dynamics (traveling observer) observe and say, it counts only the opinion of the (dialectical) change (the driving force of the dialectic). This additionally shows, who is truly in charge in the worlds of dialectics.
By reading these sentences, and comparing these earthly heroes of the work and obligations to those who spent a few month on the international orbiting station of peace, which constantly moves very fast around the Earth, and who also were busy with accomplishment of different activities and obligations, continuously exercising and training in order to be physically fit for doing it, after their return on Earth, in spite of the scientific fact that they are a few nano-seconds younger than those who were "either moving or stationary" on the Earth, they also do not look out so. Moreover, they have to spend some time in the recovery centers ["a sort of Eden" as a reward for their return]. The instructive message from this kind of traveling through the (close) vastness of space and time is that for slowing down the aging or for surviving, if you so please, a small Eden has to be a mandatory module of each space-shuttle on long distances. Perhaps, it is not a bad idea of having it at disposal during the journey through this earthly social (physical) universe too. Of course, if thou can afford it. With these remarks of mine, quantitative aspects of the theory of relativity and the corresponding measurement were not put under question mark but rather focus was put on quality properties and related qualitative manifestations of the dialectic in time dia space.
- To find such quantitative manifestations and paradoxes of this dynamic (relative) way of understanding the time and space, there is no need for (the scientifically experimental) fast traveling through the vastness of this universe [gradually approaching the speed of light]. It is present here on the Earth from immemorial times. For example, just compare a person, who is still relatively young [quantitatively, has not lived so many years], but (dis-qualitatively) already worn out with the (own) pace of life, life-style, as well as with his own attitude towards the meaning of life in general in this created social (physical) universe (own dia societal space-time), to another one, who is (much) older [quantitatively, has already lived longer], but still [qualitatively in much greater extent] physically fit and vital (in the spiritual and mental sense too).
Recall, the dialectic is, on the first place, focused on these quality properties of time, in time dia space, understood in terms of harvesting them at the right (level of the development of) time dia the right place (in space). In short, the power of dialectical change and its manifestations in a dialectically long-run, understood in terms of the dialectics (of dialectics dia negations of negations) in action, will mask even more "real" faces of the existing static and dynamic conceptions of time and space [by acting both behind and beyond reach of these events]. On the other hand, this methodological approach (dialectical interactive approach), which was developed in the purpose of a more authentic following these (seamless) changes of dialectical worlds, both inside and out (there) of me ⇄ thee ⇄ us, equipped with its methodological procedures [by implementing the appropriate methods and techniques] can help to better understand these initiated dia-processes of the change, during creative attempts to be solved many (other unsolved) puzzles of the time "and VERSUS dia" space.
Boundaries of the Operation of Laws of Physics
Although the general theory of relativity marked the beginning of a new era of understanding the time and space, especially, by explaining various phenomena, which happens (deep inside) the macro-universe, far better than the Newtonian static conception of space and time, it became unfashionable, because it is not applicable within the micro-universe [dialectical worlds of elementary (sub) particles]. For this reason, from the early days of gaining popularity of quantum physics, Einstein, as well as other proponents of this (DYNAMICALLY) relational way of the thinking made a lot of efforts to develop an all-comprehensive theory.
In my opinion, their methodological approach was postulated on the wrong methodological (DYNAMIC) presumptions and assumptions of the (DIALECTICAL) reality. As it above was argued, all ESSENTIAL processes in the time "AND versus DIA" space are DIALECTICAL nature, and not of static nature or dynamic one. Or uttered it in another way, these complex dialectical processes cannot be so simply expressed by means of the quantitative math but this dialectical content requires the development of some sort of the QUALITATIVE MATHEMATICS
- [for the "quantitatisation" of the very complex dialectical properties, manifestations and aspects of the second and third basic dialectical principle].
THE FOUR PRE-ANCIENT ELEMENTS in the Role of Interpretation of the First Basic Dialectical Principle, Aspect, Property and Manifestation of Time DIA Space: The Unity and Dialectical Tensions of Dialectical Contradictions
In short, seen from the dialectical point of view, by mathematicians actually were interpreted all (quantitative) aspects of the first basic dialectical principle in time DIA space [The Unity and Struggle of Dialectical Contradictions in Time DIA Space], or more precisely, quantitative aspects of a (static) cross-section of it: The very (imaginary) instant of the UNITY of the four elements (fire, earth, air, water). In other words, time and space were made static ("stopped"), and then this static state (staticity of physical laws) was described and formulated in terms of quantitative math. For further info READ: The three basic dialectical principles, aspects, properties and manifestations in (of) time DIA space. By adding the time [or more exactly the present (time-space continuum of instants), or the past, as it above was done, and then elaborated] as the fourth dimension, (only) DYNAMIC (quantitative) aspects and properties of the time and space were interpreted (but not dialectical ones too), and then formulated with the help of the quantitative maths (understood in the sense of developing appropriate theories such as theory of relativity, string theory......).
This clearly shows that the perceived world (reality), seen from the point of view of this dialectical methodological approach, is NOT FOUR-DIMENSIONAL, as it is often (mis-) interpreted in the [scientific, philosophical, cultural, artistic, everyday] life but rather here a word is about the reflection, description, and expression of the DYNAMIC aspects, properties and manifestations of the reality (spacetime continuum). Keep in mind, in the enormous vastness of the world of dialectics, within which the dialectical change dominates (and not endless movement), each concept of the space-time continuum of instants comes sooner or later to an end. This is also admitted by the proponents of the theory of relativity in their statements that the strong power of a gravity source is able to bend or annihilate ("swallow") the light ("massless" photons).
- The peculiarity of the mega-dialect time is both perceivable and observable in everyday life in spite of this way of joining it together with the three physical dimensions of space into space-time. Seen from the point of view of the dialectical understanding of time and space, this (scientific) way of putting (all complexity of) the mega-dialect time on an equal footing with three physical dimensions of physical space is unsustainable and (self-) illusive. As a result of this simple-reasonable (methodological) approach, it might be argued that the physical space [an incomplete and deficient understanding of the mega-dialect space because of not having all necessary and appropriate integral dialects (parts), and for this reason not enough of quality ("ingredients") to be equalized and compete with] is, in fact, a prisoner of the MEGA-DIALECT - time.
- For example, although it can be chosen moving through the physical space (space in time: matter embedded in the past) or not, the "movement" through time is inevitable. Or more precisely said, the passing of time is unstoppable, and happens whether it is liked or not. In other words, within expanses of the physical space (in time), there is a relative [that is, not absolute but potential] freedom of choice of the direction of the movement [left, right, up, down, diagonal, cyclical, spiral....] but not in the time too, once a choice was made [the concept of the arrow of time]. Or put it in another way, despite this apparent diversity but specific and ostensible variety of choices within the realm of physical space, the freedom of movement, seen from the perspective of (the medium of) time (emotively emotional dia physical presence), is very limited. Especially, when it was [understood in terms of distinguishing Good from evil and] reflected through the prism of the corresponding spatial medium (mind dia reason): one way (direction) in momentum, which is actually a criss-cross meeting point of the Time in Space and Space in Time in (their medium of) time dia space.
- But these physical barriers for free movement are not valid for the emotively emotional presence in these inner dialectical worlds. For example, in this way it is feasible multiple simulations of these movements (at low costs), understood in the sense of undertaking the appropriate creative journeys through this dialectical understanding of time and space. In addition to this (inner) opportunity of the (temporary or ostensible) freedom of movement in terms of time, as well as various concepts of the so-called parallel worlds, parallel (micro-, macro-) universes, seen from this dialectical perspective, belongs to the realm of the eternity (of times) DIA infinity (of spaces). For this reason, as it will be later more thoroughly elaborated, the concept (and developed conception) of the eternity DIA infinity is not put on an equal footing with the concept (conception and dialectical understanding) of time and space.
Either way, because the other two dialectical principles put focus on the QUALITATIVE aspects, properties, and manifestations of the time DIA space, it is very difficult to render them with the help of the quantitative mathematics. These dialectical aspects, properties and manifestation of the reality will be later more deeply elaborated in other chapters of this creative article. By summarizing all of the aforementioned, there is a need for the development of some kind of the qualitative (dialectical) math. Or put it in another way, within the worlds of dialectics there is no valid static DIA dynamic law of physics.
Primary Law of the Dialectic
On the other hand, in full compliance with the dialectical interactive approach, the only valid ("physical") law in worlds of dialectics (eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces) is: ....the act of Birth (coming into being: thesis) dia Life (antithesis) ⇢ some form of manifestation of the annulment, annihilation, DEATH (dialectical synthesis) DIA (some manifestation of the notion) REBIRTH (Renewed Thesis).... This interpretation of the primary law of dialectic from the standpoint of this applied dialectical methodological approach, as it will be later more thoroughly elaborated, is valid in the macro-universe, in the realm of five basic senses, as well as in the micro-universe (world of quants). Or said it in a different way, the only CERTAIN FUTURE EVENT (with)in TIME DIA SPACE, after each kind of manifestation of the notion birth (thesis) during initiated dialectical processes of life (antithesis), is some form of the manifestation of annulling, annihilating, DEATH (synthesis: the (physical) ending point of the act of birth (coming into being).
For your consolation, in spite of this unwanted outcome, seen from the point of view of dialectical interactive approach, the meaning of the initiated dialectical processes in TIME DIA SPACE by the act of birth (thesis) is neither the antithesis (life dia living), nor the synthesis (DEATH) but THE RENEWED THESIS: Rebirth. In this dialectical context, the act of re-birth (at a new level of time DIA space) should be understood in the sense of some form of (renewed) DIALECTICAL manifestation of the BIRTH (thesis), as final result of the dialectics of dialectics DIA negations of negations in action. In this context, the meaning of the notion - re-birth, seen from the perspective of a HIGHER achieved level of development of time DIA space, should be understood in terms of GOOD (new quality), while its meaning in the sense of dialectically LOWER level of development of time DIA space should be understood in terms of some bad (EVIL) creative outcome (disquality).
Dialectics of Dialectics DIA Negations of Negations
THE CREATIVE EXPANSES OF A FOUR - TRIANGULAR STAR: The Ground Plan of a Dialectical Pyramid of Time and Space, which was embodied in the Ground Plan of the Great Pyramid of Cheops in Egypt
Seen from this dialectical perspective, the dialectics of dialectics DIA NEGATIONS OF NEGATIONS are in fact a further improving and ennobling of the initiated dialectical processes within the "ground plan of this dialectical pyramid (of time and space)", understood in the sense of a further dialectical synthesizing of the previously accumulated quality (and quantity) by removing the transferred quantity DIA accumulated dis-quality at this higher level of the eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces. In other words, removing everything within dialectical sieves set in progress that was considered at a lower level of dialectical understanding of time and space to be preserved and transferred for re-evaluation on this higher level of time DIA space, for one or another reason. By the way said, rumors and speculations outside of circles of the initiated into this hidden knowledge about the role of the ground plan of a pyramid (its “fifth” side) was referred by Aristotle [as well as in the written sources of the Far Eastern cultures] as the FIFTH ELEMENT (ether).
But taking into account the fact that on the ground plan of this pyramid, the dialectical processes of the standard manifestation of the ether concept take place, as well as the further interactive action, refinement, and enrichment of the four basic elements (fire, water, air, earth) on a new, preferably at a higher level of time DIA space (the layer of this pyramid of time and space), they cannot be qualitatively equated with this "fifth" element. In other words, the ether represents a general (standard) creative framework (for example, a vacuum), but also every specific created environment and creative ambience [wrapped on all sides with an invisible protective membrane] on one of the levels (building blocks) of this pyramid of time and the space within which these four elements interact creatively and cooperate with each other. Because of this special (protective) role of this form of manifestation of ether - vacuum, as well as its ability to metamorphose into various forms of manifestation of ether - ambient, which actually created the necessary environment and desirable ambient for the origin of life here on Earth, as well as the conditions for its maintenance, it could be said that this is really about one (HIGHER) SUPER-ELEMENT, and not about some fifth, non-existent element. For further information, read, Conception of Ether in Ancient Hidden Knowledge.
Judgement, is It Inevitable: Death DIA Afterlife → the Afterlife of the Time in Space
Reconsidering these dialectical contents and related initiated dia-processes of this further improvement and enrichment of the four basic elements (fire, water, air, earth) from the perspective of the primary law of dialectic on this new level of time DIA space, these complex dialectical processes of the (re-)evaluation [a culmination of the initiated cycles of dialectics of dialectics DIA negations of negations] take place after the annulment, annihilation, death, but before the rebirth [dialectical synthesis DIA the renewed thesis of the primary of dialectic]. Or put it in another way, it might be argued that here is the methodological source of religious ideas in connection with various forms of judgments. Either way, whether you are a believer or not, in a concrete world of dialectics, there is only place for THE HIGHEST QUALITY of the available ones at that particular level of the development of time DIA space. Or more simply said (without help of a higher spiritual force), because of the high competition for getting a "ticket" that allows the entry into the wished world of dialectics, the TIME IN SPACE (future in spirit) of a concrete being, species.... is going to be pushed in the suitable world of dialectics to be reborn there, respectively to be reunited with the appropriate SPACE IN TIME [matter embedded in the past: the act of conceiving as a precondition for the BIRTH] in order to restart the dialectical processes of LIFE (dia living) by re-creating the appropriate SPATIAL medium (mind dia reason) DIA the related medium of TIME (physical presence dia emotively emotional presence).
Conception of the Free Will
As a reflection of these "spiritual" (unobservable) happenings in the worlds of dialectic, just carefully re-consider how is TOUGH COMPETITION for the life in the worlds of flora and fauna, understood in terms of reproduction of their genetic codes DIA why it is so. This shows that to the mankind in the course of LIFE was allowed to use the conception of free will to the greatest feasible extent, understood in the sense of choice between good and evil options, or between the destiny and the fate, if you so will [a bipolar DIA binary meaning of these notions], that is dependent on the achieved level of development of consciousness. In the life reality, the bad (evil) action is recognized by a human pangs of CONSCIENCE, that actually says to a HUMAN BEING, whether it was handled in a good or bad (evil) way, whether something good or evil nature is and the like. In order to be satisfied these higher human interests, the distinguishing GOOD from evil plays the central role within this developed methodological approach. Regardless of this, the distinct (meaning of) distinguishing GOOD from evil still remains the subject of dispute in the realm of culture (dia religion), philosophy, art, and science.
Conception of the Eternity DIA Infinity versus Conception of the Time DIA Space
In addition to the aforementioned, since the dialectical interactive approach makes a distinction between the (conception of) eternity DIA infinity and the (closely related conceptions of) time DIA space, here were omitted considerations of the validity of this primary law of dialectic within conceptions of eternity DIA infinity, such as for example, the religious conception of the Eternal (Immortal) God because it can not be verified in terms of applied methodological approaches with modern science that He exists. To avoid this barren debate at this stage of the development of this creative article, according to Plato, each (methodological) conception of the time DIA space is actually a copy of an eternal (DIA infinite) model of dialectical reality, understood in terms of its validity and value. In other words, on the basis of a (n eternal) model of reality can be developed a myriad of its copies (appliances), which are limited in terms of their (spatial) reach and (temporary) duration [the assigned span of time DIA appropriate scope of space], because the inherited imperfections of the (eternal) model will increase over the passage of time DIA space. Or by saying it in a dialectical manner, everything that came into being within each manifestation of the time DIA space (copy), no matter how long it lasts, will pass away sooner or later. This should not be understood in terms of disappearing in absolute terms but rather it will transcend, transform, metamorphose, transfigure from a dialectical state in time DIA space in some other manifestation of it. Or more simply said, WHERE (TO) this dialectical content could have vanished from the eternity (of times) DIA infinity (of spaces), whatever your understanding of it is?
Keep in mind, within the worlds of dialectical understanding of the notion - life dia living, once a copy of this (eternal DIA infinite) model of dialectical reality came into being, that is, a dialectical creatively interactive framework of time and space was created, this (primary) copy starts with the reproduction, replication and proliferation of its own copies [of time (in time) DIA space] within the imaginative boundaries of this created dialectical framework (from generation to generation). Since this dialectical creatively interactive framework of time and space [its span of time DIA scope of space] is limited understood in terms of a successful overcoming of all possible challenges of the dialectical living reality, that is, an endless reproduction and multiplication of the primordial copy (of time DIA space), as a further consequence of the accumulation of these inherent imperfections of the (eternal) model DIA available information, only those created copies of the primordial original copy, which over the passage of this dialectical understanding of time and space had managed to keep in memory DIA in some way to recollect (recall) the original information of the model of eternity DIA infinity
- [understood in the methodological sense, going BEHIND the perceived underlying challenges in a particular span of the time DIA the appropriate scope of space],
or even further by reminding and recollecting thyself with true information and message, which comes from the eternity DIA infinity, in one or another way
- [understood in methodological terms, going BEYOND the perceived underlying challenges in a particular span of the time DIA the appropriate scope of space],
will succeed to overcome all the challenges of dialectical reality (of worlds of dialectic), as well as to make a dialectical breakthrough. And for achieving that, from this myriad of created copies in course of the time DIA space is ONLY needed ONE such a copy, or two in some cases, which had managed to successfully bridge (over) the gap, that separates a copy (time DIA space) from the (model of) eternity DIA infinity
- [with a flash of spirit: to be refreshed the inner being DIA updating the code of life],
to revise the (meaning of) past in this spiritual way, thereby changing the (course of) future (events)!
Dialectical Creative Framework for Orientation in the Eternity of Times DIA Infinity of Spaces
Actually, this SPIRITUAL (cap) ability in interaction with the primary law of the dialectic is what distinguishes a star with fruitful planets within macro-universe from the myriad of other stars, or a plant, living being from a myriad of others within the realm of the five basic senses (the present). In other words, this faculty allows them, for example, adaptation to changes in the external environment. More about this will be said later in the chapter devoted to the spiritual re-enlightenment VERSUS the miraculous acting of a chancy mutation: The contemporary scientific view, which puts SOLO-FOCUS on the consequences of this spiritual re-enlightenment. I hope, it is not difficult to perceive and observe that seen from the point of view of this dialectical methodological approach, the contemporary scientific approach is METHODOLOGICALLY INCONSISTENT, and for this reason, it is incorrect because of its focus on the EFFECT (physical, matter-like consequences) instead of putting the focus on the CAUSE of that (the spiritual re-enlightenment). Keep in mind, seen from the dialectical perspective, without a creator (cause) there is no creation (after-effect). It would be similar to the arguing, for example, that a building (Space in Time: matter embedded in the past) came into being as a result of some kind of chancy event, ignoring the fact that its spatial externalization started in the "head" of an architect as an idea of DIA thought ⇢ design (Time in Space: future wrapped and hidden in the spirit). In addition to this, it could also be argued that acting of the primary law of dialectic understood in the sense of (a further) accumulation of the quality of time, in time DIA space (from generation to generation) plays a significantly greater role in the emergence of new species than the insufficiently provided evidence in support of the idea of miraculous action of a random mutation.
To sum up, the miracle of a random mutation is very difficult to be imagined in dialectical worlds of the inherent imperfection of the (eternal) model of reality. In other words, a CONTINUAL OCCURRENCE of so many miracles within the richness of such a DIVERSIFIED flora and fauna, as it is the case here on the Earth, thereby ignoring the already vanished kinds and species, to call this regular phenomenon a result of the random event [it sounds а little bit strange, doesn't it?']. Particularly not in entropic worlds, where everything in the universe, according to another eshellon of scientists, eventually moves from order to disorder (chaos), and where is in power Murphy's law that states, "If something can go wrong, it will." And be sure it will go wrong in these "low" worlds of dialectic, which are characterized and recognizable by the low level of development of the consciousness of its inhabitants (DIA the related pang of conscience). As an example, just compare how many evil (bad) options (temptations) waits for you to be carried out compared to the good (right) ones. Often, a human dia human-loving being has felt so helpless that can do nothing (good) except of passive watching the (public committing of) evil around. Or simply-mindedly to close eyes like a proverbial monkey, or to prick the head in the sand like an ostrich, and then to pretend like nothing happens. Anyway, pay thy attention, in full compliance with the higher knowledge, the mega-dialect space was redefined in the way that it begins with the dialect - SPIRIT, followed by the mind dia reason, matter, and not the other way around.
Trigger and Driving Force of the Primary Law of Dialectic
Seen from this dialectical perspective, it might be argued that just this awareness of the power and might, which is hidden in the eternity DIA infinity, is actually the trigger and driving force of the considered primary dialectical law, which acts in hidden, that means, behind and beyond these initiated dialectical processes within time and space (copy). It may also be argued that the power of eternity DIA infinity is especially the driving force of the notion REBIRTH [manifested at a higher, or at the same, or at the lower level of development of time DIA space], in one or another way. Or more simply said, within this imaginary dialectical framework of eternity DIA infinity, there is no other option, apart from the occurring rebirth (of a Time in Space) in one or another form of the suitable dialectical Space in Time, WHATEVER your presentation of the eternity DIA infinity is, in order to be resolved its powerful and mighty grip and the corresponding pressure on the time DIA space (copy).
Freewill reflected through the Prism of Distinguishing Good from Evil Options
Or put it in another (philosophical) way, the eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces (model) does not offer an eternity of choices, particularly not good ones because the choices are NOT INFINITE but a concrete and a limited notion, especially within the realm of time DIA space (copy). As an example, just re-consider the conception of the freedom of choice and free-will within a concrete manifestation of a dialectical societal universe, only to be realized that it is constrained by various cultural customs and laws, by the feasibility of (FREE) moving from a Space in Time to another one and so on. In short, all these constraints are consequences of the unsolved dilemma, what is Good and what is bad (evil) in absolute terms of the meaning this notion. At the same time, the verified constraints of the freedom (and of free will) in terms of Good, which were acquired over dialectically long time DIA space (wisdom of the gone times), can be utilized for the life-long learning how to distinguish Good from evil. Anyway, for your proper orientation in time dia space, generally speaking, as the lower level of the development of consciousness is, as more constraints there will be. As an utmost result of it, like in the everyday life DIA living, it is not feasible to avoid some form of the HIGHER judgment (evaluation) within this unobservable (spiritual) manifestation of the time DIA space (copy), and whether it will be this METHODOLOGICALLY elaborated conception of the dialectics of dialectics (DIA negations of negations), God, "nothingness", or something else, it is up to you to choose it, and then to implant it into your value system for a proper orientation in this dialectical understanding of time and space.
Limits of the Five Basic Senses
This shows that this primary, basic, fundamental DIALECTICAL LAW of time DIA space is valid in the realm of macro-universe (... birth ⇢ life ⇢ death DIA rebirth of a universe, galaxy, star...), within the boundaries of five basic (human, animals', scientific ....) senses, as well as within the realm of micro-universe (dialectical worlds of quants). Dialectically summarizing and synthesizing all previously said, within the boundaries of five basic (human, animals', scientific ....) senses, the time can be perceived by the mind dia reason in the sense of flowing from the past through the present and into the future [in some form of manifestation of the arrow of time] because the duration of LIFE DIA LIVING
- [or in the methodological sense, the duration of the path of motion of the time DIA space (DYNAMICS) compared to the duration of change (the DIALECTIC)]
is long enough to be DISTINCTLY perceived and recorded these events and related changes in space with the five basic senses. On the other hand, as it was further traveled away from the dialect - PRESENT (out of the realm of five basic senses) towards this (recti) linear understanding of the dialect - future [for example, by looking deeper into the vastness of time DIA space], either in terms of the largest conceivable (for example, universe), or in terms of the smallest conceivable (the world of elementary particles), as the rectilinear comprehension of the time and space is less and less appropriate, unreliable, imprecise, ILLUSIONARY one.
Or, to put it another way, the main cause of the various deviations of Time in Space [future wrapped in spirit: NOW AND THERE] DIA the Space in Time [matter already embedded in the past: NOW AND HERE] is just the use of these five basic (animal's too) senses, the purpose of which, on the first place, is the orientation ON VERY SHORT DISTANCES of space AND time. In other words, they are just a tool to help living beings to deal with the world around them [even if it does not actually reflect the dialectical reality]. To cut this long story short, the aforementioned complex dialectical contents should be (properly) reconsidered, interpreted, and reflected in the time DIA space through the prism of two TYPICAL human senses [sense of intuition and the sense of feeling of inner self] within the appropriate medium of space (mind dia reason) by using the common sense, understood as well as reinterpreted from the standpoint of the physical dia emotively emotional presence [in the encompassed (and considered) span of time DIA the appropriate scope of space].
- Although, the power of thy spirit lifts thee up in these physically unreachable heights, which are already occupied by thy emotively emotional presence in these depths of time dia space, it is the sharpness, acumen, and healthy judgment of thy common sense that brings thee down with the most valuable ark of treasure, which continues to hover beyond the reach of the gravitational source of thy physical presence, making thee busy in this way with forming sentences, through deeper insight into these dialectical contents under creative re-examination, from the notions thou never heard before, and which exist only in this ark of the hidden treasure;
- reconstructing and repainting a whole gallery of images of this heavens as a skillful artist does it using both its inner perception and farsighted vision and imagery in order to pronounce himself; a child hidden inside thy inner spaces obsessed with solving this puzzle of the captured time dia space with unclear contours and blurry outlines of this painter's mosaic, yet to be assembled of these oddly shaped interlocked dialects using its innate intuition; acting within thy own chest, full of hidden drawers, unlocking them by instinctively absorbing ghostly reflections of these heavenly pictures already seen or experienced over an unknown time dia space;
- holding thee also captive in this temporally constructed empire for discovering the unknown, inflated by the creative power of thy endless imagination, which was driven by spontaneity of thy inborn eagerness, just to get this balloon, full of thy dreams, burst with a random stinger prick of thy unpredictable creativity to release the accumulated dews on the walls of this very fragile and still uncertain (pro) creation;
- and all this that these gems are gathered and transformed within this vacuum of the creative silence into valuable drops of knowledge, descending and landing down at the speed of the spiritual flash of thy mind; and then these fertile precipitations are deposited in the shallow bay of thy reason (and cause for doing it all), which is later used to dispel this pointless fog of ignorance in hungry heads around thee, short of knowledge, but eager to learn.
More about this approach to the process of knowledge creation can be read in the creative article: Milestones of the Dialectical Creatively Interactive Way of Creating Knowledge. In addition to this, paradoxically enough, it could be argued, since a copy of the universe
- [or perhaps, .... of the galaxy, of the earth, of your homeland]
was implanted into the vast expanses of the inner being of each human being
- [with deep roots in the eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces],
a good insight into the unknown and distant time DIA space could also be obtained with the help of emotively emotional presence [the ignored and underdeveloped spiritual abilities] within this internal copy of the external "universe in small". Or more simply said, cleaning and maintenance (from generation to generation) of these invisible channels for the communication in the spiritual sense, it can be used for the purpose of a faster way of creative traveling through this inner vastness of time DIA space instead of using external (physical) means (which are limited by the speed of light). Actually, this kind of subconscious acting understood in the sense of presentiment and feeling of these inner dialectical contents with the help of the sixth and seventh human sense, is not entirely unknown in these earthly spaces, though it is externally constrained, as well as overlapped with the abilities and rech of the five basic senses. Read later about the adventures of Christopher Columbus.
Emotively Emotional Presence: Its Power and Limits
In other words, the physical presence (of a body) is a passive observer of the reflection of a manifestation of matter (star, galaxy...) embedded in the (remote) past
- [distant events of the SPACE IN TIME, and which are wrongly perceived as the "HERE and NOW"]
with the sense of sight
- [the range of which is only appropriate for the realm of the present (time)]
because the abilities of perception of events in this remote future incorporated in the spirit [actual events of the TIME IN SPACE, understood in terms of NOW and THERE] were lost or are underdeveloped. In other words, since these primordial spiritual abilities were lost, only this remnant of the SPIRITUAL presence with the help of the (underdeveloped) sixth and seventh sense
- [understood in the sense of emotively emotional presence: NOW and THERE]
is able to peer into INVISIBLE INNER SPACES
- [understood in terms of aforementioned manifestation of the universe in small]
of this dialectical way of conceiving and understanding of (the dialect -) FUTURE (WITHIN THEE), respectively in immense spaces of the very distant dialectical worlds of TIME IN SPACE: future wrapped in SPIRIT, or into the tiny (infinitesimal) vastnesses of the micro-universe (the dialectical worlds of dialectuls), if you so please.
III. Puzzle of the Micro-Universe
Happenings in the World of Quants: Does it here the Word goes about a Traveling through Past?
After this long but the necessary digression (of the subject under consideration) in time DIA space, it was reached the right moment DIA place for a deeper reconsideration of the events, which occur within the micro-universe.
- According to the contemporary physicists, at a subatomic level there is no way to distinguish the past from the future simply looking at each pair of particles (couple - dialect). In a typical interaction involving subatomic particles, two particles MAY COME TOGETHER and interact in some way to produce two different particles, which then separate.
Seen from the perspective of the developed dialectical interactive approach, this dialectical content reminds me on an endless journey of a couple dialect (thesis dia antithesis), such as, for example, the imaginative traveling of a spermatozoon and an ovum ("twin") through time DIA space, which after joining together, FOR SOME REASON, never form a zygote (a single cell) but rather they were transformed DIA transition into some kind of different "twin", which then each time separates in order to find THE RIGHT particle (partner) in the purpose of forming TWO new couple - dialects. It seems, in difference to the living beings, species, plants.... of the present time and the macro-universe, in a broader, farther and deeper sense (stars, galaxies....), within the dialectical worlds of micro-universe due to some reason of being "robbed" of the suitable set of "chromosomes", that is, of the information how to do it, there is no fertilization (forming a zygote: a single cell), which normally develops into an embryo. WHY IT IS SO? An answer to this puzzle of the micro-universe might be that it is not the purpose of their journey ("life mission"). Or answering it in terms of the rectilinear comprehension of time (and space), they for some reason do not follow the arrow of the present time: past ⇢ present ⇢ future BUT THE INVERSE ONE. In other words, within the worlds of dialectic, the micro-universe mimics and “mirrors” the macro-universe in an inverse way: contraction versus expansion. In short, with this dialectical content [dialectical worlds of the involved spermatozoa and ovums], it seems, the GREATEST DREAM of scientists was fulfilled: an endless JOURNEY THROUGH THE PAST, respectively in both directions (in philosophical terms of the meaning this notion), if you so will (conception of the destiny dia fate, for example)
Traveling through the Parental Tree of Ancestors
Or seen from the perspective of the primary law of dialectic, it looks like an endless traveling through the paternal (parental) tree of ancestors of two particles (spermatozoa of a father DIA ovums of a mother), where the happenings in (of) THE LIFE of each born living being, creature..., are not of any interest for them, that means, this dialectical content for some reason purposefully was shortened, neglected and skipped. An another example of this in the living reality is the instantaneous death of an infant after the birth (negligible duration of life), followed by (continual) rebirth with the same fatal dialectical outcome and so on in time DIA space. Because in this way [by ignoring and neglecting the happenings of life DIA living] were created three dots (of the thesis, antithesis, synthesis ~ birth, life, death DIA one (dot of the renewed thesis ~ rebirth), it was not by chance that physicists can not distinguish the past from the future simply by looking at these dia-processes on so a tiny scale of time DIA space. Seen from the methodological point of view, the reasons are again the wrong (DYNAMIC) methodological presumptions of the constructed reality. In other words, within dialectical worlds of the micro-universe the speed of occurring of dialectical processes (change) is extremely high compared to the (duration of) dynamic (DIA static) ones: life dia living of an (created) elementary particle. Recall, the major features of the worlds of dialectic are neither static processes, nor dynamic processes but the DIALECTICAL ONES, that means, the point is always (hidden) in (the sieves of) dialectics (of dialectics DIA negations of negations set in motion).
Puzzle of the Micro-Universe
To be made even more realistic these happenings within dialectical worlds of the micro-universe, imagine here the main actors are the GHOSTS of the spermatozoon and ovum ("twin"), which after accomplishment of their life mission in the world of five basic senses (their unification gave the birth to a living being, creature), were captured for some reason within a dialectical world of the micro-universe. To cut this long story short too, these happenings within the tiny dialectical worlds of micro-universe remind me on the happenings, which were described by the Christian conception of the so-called SECOND DEATH [a manifestation of the hell for living beings]. In either way, to get back into dialectical worlds of the organic matter (...birth dia life ⇢ death DIA rebirth ... we are familiar with), that is, out of this gloomy flashing labyrinth of the micro-universe they were condemned futilely to travel through the (barren) past in purpose of establishing, who was the true source of origin of the created primordial living being DIA (reunification of) them: God, nothingness or something else? In other words, only after they solved this puzzle, as reward for it, it will be allowed them to return in the higher (fruitful) organic worlds.
Since they travel through the past, unlike the creative result of their joining together dia fertilization (CREATING a single cell), this instant in time DIA the appropriate space each time meant (was) the end of their single existence. Because the methodological presumption of this model of the constructed reality is ignoring and omission of the happenings during the LIFE of all created beings of the past, they each time instantly have to solve the puzzle of true occurring after the "DEATH DIA REBIRTH" of the created dialectical upshot, that is, in a flash of moment to find out who died DIA who or what was reborn. Since this dialectical content, in fact, presents entry into a new world of dialectic DIA exit from another one [world, cell, proton, neutron, star system, galaxy, universe, if you so will], it is not at all an easy task to untangle (and to find the clue in) this intertwined clew of the considered dialectical content, requiring spending a lot of time DIA (suitable) space to be overcome the corresponding DIALECTICAL distances between and among each ...birth dia life ⇢ death (negation of the negation) DIA rebirth..., respectively in the methodological sense, to overcome distances between and among ....the each thesis, antithesis, synthesis DIA renewed thesis....
Gathering DIA Interchange of Information
Or reinterpreted this model of reality using the vocabulary of physics, "they come together and interact in some way" [GATHERING DIA INTERCHANGE OF THE NEEDED INFORMATION], and only if THE RIGHT PARTNER was found [that's why they MAY come together or NOT], two different particles are produced, which then separate AGAIN in order to find and eventually with the right partner to be reunified over again. In other words, all it was done in the purpose of re-establishing, who were their GRANDMOTHERS AND GRANDFATHERS, respectively to be found out who was mothers' father and mother (the first couple - dialect) DIA who was fathers' mother and father (the second couple - dialect)..... In short, this traveling through the past continues endlessly, that is, they will be split OVER AND OVER with the goal of finding the right particle - partner each time, respectively, to find out who were their mothers and fathers (GREAT GRANDMOTHERS AND GREAT GRANDFATHERS of a concrete person) and so on through this eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces of the worlds of dialectic. Although someone might argue, this interpreted puzzle of the micro-universe could be unraveled easier within the realm of the present (time), because most of us at least know who was our mother (and father)...., sooner or later this kind of the verified knowledge is going to end, that means, the ghost of the last known person (the great - great... mother and father) in each of this parental tree will be confronted and "faced" with the afore described challenges, which already were "experienced" by ghosts of the spermatozoon and ovum.
Stars as the Pictorial Script of the Dialectical Interactive Approach
THE CREATIVE EXPANSES OF A FOUR - TRIANGULAR STAR: Potentially REGENERATIVEABLE Prolific Star DIA ("Self"-)Transfering of the LIFE, with words of Plato
2x3 DIA 3x2 LEPTONS - QUARKS, A static cross section in time DIA space
A Twelve-Ponted Star representing 2 FERMIONS consisting of the TWO Dalectically Synthesised * 6 Six-Pointed Stars:
I hope, it was managed me TO BE CONJURED UP a small part of these complex dialectical processes (dia-processes), which take place within a subatomic level of this micro-universe: the dialectical interplay of 2x3 (triplets) DIA 3x2 (pairs of) leptons - quarks, in spite of the fact it was considered the dialectical journey of only a pair of leptons (instead of three x 2 = 6 quarks), whilst the (concurrent) events of the dialectical interplay of two triplets (2x3) within this six-pointed star completely were ignored. In short, in the pre-ancient hidden knowledge this dialectical content under creative consideration was represented by a six-pointed star [the primary school of dialectic of two dialects: thesis - antithesis] Because each of these six leptons (fermion) has its anti-particle, this more complex dialectical content was represented by a twelve-pointed star [the higher school of dialectic of four dialects,] which actually consists of the two dialectically synthesized six-pointed-stars or it was created with a suitable dialectical interplay of four dialects (fire, water, air, earth).
Although, seen from the rectilinear perspective of the understanding of time and space, it may look like that they follow the inverse arrow of time [traveling through the barren past], one cannot deny that the future is also spent in this dialectical way of traveling, respectively the arrow of time for each of these involved particles in my, thy, our mind DIA reason [of the purpose of this kind of traveling through time DIA space] emerges dia it can be reconstructed. In other words, seen from the perspective of the dialectical interactive approach, the direction of the future (events: its flow) depends on the PURPOSE OF THY CREATIVE JOURNEY, and for this reason, the future should be sought within the (inner) vastness of the TIME IN SPACE [future in spirit: NOW AND (T)HERE], because thy physical presence (of the body) is surrounded on all sides by (the events of) the past (SPACE IN TIME: matter embedded in the past; the HERE and NOW).
Dialectical Comprehension of Future
This was an additional reason why the dialect - future was listed in this methodological approach (of understanding the time) as the first (INITIAL) dialect and not the dialect - past, as well as why the constituent dialects of time are not arranged in a straight line, but are simply separated from each other using a comma. In other words, the mega-dialect time is (re)defined and presented as FUTURE, emotively emotional DIA physical presence (of body), past. To cut this long story short, seen from the standpoint of the dialectical interactive approach, the future is hidden within thee (Time in Space-like), and for this reason, the future should be sought within the framework of these inner expanses of TIME IN SPACE [hidden and wrapped future in the spirit: NOW and THERE]. But its fruitful or barren transition and transformation into the past, understood in terms of its SPATIAL EXTERNALISATION into some form of the Space in Time (matter embedded in the past) also depends on the intentions DIA intentionality of the key-actors [on their abilities to create future, that is, to change the course of future events] as well as it depends on the natural and the higher heavenly forces too.
Either way, these hidden inner spaces can be perceived only with the help of the (well developed) sixth and seventh sense (understood in terms of the emotively emotional presence: NOW and THERE). On the other hand, the (results of) the past (events: Space in Time) surrounds my-thy-our (myths) physical presence (of the body), that is, this dialectical content is Space in Time-like (matter already embedded in the past), and for this reason, since this is outside of me-thee-us, this [previously invisible, and unobservable] dialectical content (Time in Space) can NOW and HERE (Space in Time) be perceived, noticed, and observed with the five basic senses. Or to put it another way, everything that is perceptible with the five basic senses was previously conceived in these invisible and imperceptible inner worlds of Time in Space (NOW and THERE), and was only then manifested and materialized in outer dialectical worlds of the Space in Time (HERE and NOW). In this way, the inner future (hidden and wrapped in the spirit) has completed its mission with the external act of its transition and transformation into (matter embedded in) the past. For further information, read: Arrow of Time.
IV. Further Implications of the Dialectical Understanding of Time and Space in the Life Reality
Does Time Have a Beginning or End?
In antique Greece, Plato and Aristotle agreed that the past is eternal. Aristotle offered two reasons. Time had no beginning because, for any time, we always can imagine an earlier time, as well as for any present situation, we always can ask for its prior cause. Isaac Newton believed that both past and future time is infinite. On the other hand, contemporary physicists say it is most likely the future is potentially infinite, but it is an open question whether past time is finite (came into existence with the so-called Big Bang) or infinite, understood in terms of that only eventually a confirmed theory that is both valid in the macro-universe and micro-universe will give an answer, (whether and) why the Big Bang was the result of earlier phenomena (past time is infinite). The dialectical interactive approach encompassed and expressed this dilemma putting dots (...) before beginning each cycle of the primary dialectical law: .... Birth (coming into being: thesis) dia Life (antithesis) ⇢ some manifestation of the annulment, annihilation, DEATH (dialectical synthesis) DIA (some manifestation of the notion) REBIRTH (Renewed Thesis)... until the temporary conclusion of time (in time) DIA space is achieved because its validity was limited by the dialectical understanding of time and space (worlds of dialectic: copies of the eternal model) I, thou, we are familiar with.
The Methodological Core of the Dialectical Interactive Approach
Although some of you could argue that the primary law of dialectic can be improved extending it [to the events before birth], understood in the sense of starting the fertilization of the egg (thesis) with spermatozoon (antithesis) with the goal of creating a single cell [insemination: synthesis) DIA development of an embryo (the renewed thesis], in this simple-reasonable way it will be said nothing new, as it already Aristotle had pointed out. Furthermore, these dia-processes can vary considerably in the very diversified worlds of flora and fauna. For example, the fertilization of a (fruit DIA) seed(s) took place in a tree (plant), whilst its imbibition ("insemination") and swelling (in soil) can be delayed (the resting state) for months, years, or even centuries. On the other hand, some plants take roots very readily (willow, for example) from the cuttings or broken branches, by simply pricking them into moist soil. In short, this approach and the related applied method leads to an endless dropping into the unraveling the entangled clew of the afore considered dia-processes of PAST (of an ovum and a spermatozoon): a kind of the linear do-while loop. In other words, a much more complicated 'life' mission has already been assigned to the (ghosts of) spermatozoa and ovum instead of this simple task.
Anyway, these complex demands and issues of life (dia living), resolved in the sense of this simple-minded way of improving the primary dialectical law within the realm of the five senses, were already included in the mode of action of the three basic dialectical principles, aspects, properties and manifestations of time (in time) DIA space. Remind thyself, seen from the methodological point of view, the essence of the primary law of dialectic is embedding a pair of dialects (thesis dia antithesis) into it, for the purpose of further dialectical merging and integration of them in synthesis DIA the renewed thesis, and so on in time DIA space until the temporary conclusion is achieved. In other words, the point of this dialectical, creatively interactive content is not in its improving in the aforementioned simple-reasonable way, understood in the sense of an endless repetition of this methodological core of the dialectical interactive approach. In short, seen from this dialectical point of view, what came into being [thesis: a single cell, a living being, a particle, or a product] in order to be initiated a dialectical cycle of life, is not relevant in this methodological sense.
Puzzle of the Proverbial Chicken and Egg
In either way, even the presented conception of dialectical understanding of time and space is enough complicated because to the ghosts of "spermatozoon and ovum" actually was given the task to solve the puzzle of the proverbial chicken and egg in DIALECTICAL terms of the meaning of this notion. Or uttered it in terms of the relational conception of time (and space) to them was given the task of searching for the primordial zygote (single cell). Unfortunately for the proponents of the Bing Bang theory, even if it was assumed that this scientific theory was true (real), this is not the complete solution of this dialectical puzzle but rather an answer whether (and why) the Big Bang was the result of earlier phenomena. In short, a dialectician will not be satisfied with answer on this arisen question, how and why this (kind of the) single cell was created but who (initiated and) created it because without a creator there is no creation. Furthermore, even if the "ghosts of spermatozoon and ovum" found the answer on this question, that means, it was found out who was the creator of all and everything [the boundaries of the conception time DIA space: copies], it only arises a new question: when, where, how and why this mysterious creator created himself? But these questions are suitable only within the various earthly ways of comprehension of the time "AND versus DIA" space but not too within the conceptualizing of the eternity DIA infinity, because nobody captured within a copy of the eternal model is [cap)able to think in this (unknown and beyond understanding] way.
Plato's Conception of the Eternal Model DIA Myriad of Copies of It
It seems that Plato was in right arguing that an eternal model is only able to develop the Creator of all this, which was very well explained and elaborated within his conception of the eternal model DIA myriad of copies of it:
- "for whereas the pattern (model DIA paradigm) is existent through all eternity, the copy, on the other hand, is through all time, continually having existed, existing and being about to exist".
Although nobody exactly knows, how this model looks like as well as what is the true meaning of the secret plan of the Creator, I hope, everyone is able to perceive how it works in (living) reality. On the other hand, in the same way as each model is not the reality (but a simplification of it), including this eternal one, each copy of a model (even if it deals with the eternal one) is even MORE IMPERFECT! It might be argued that as a consequence of these IMPERFECTIONS OF THE INHERITED IMPERFECTION, in difference to these immortal beings of the eternity DIA infinity, everyone and everything that comes into being within this IMPERFECT copy of the eternal model (time DIA space) is undergone and subordinated to the primary law of dialectic. And this is good so because it is also valid for these eternal beings too each time when they visit the worlds of dialectic (copies). In other words, there is no preferential treating and exemption for anyone and for nothing within this dialectical way of comprehension of time DIA space (copy). This shows that only eternity DIA infinity, whatever your presentation of it is, which acts behind the initiated dia-processes within [the (re-)generated] time DIA space (copy), leads in a dialectically long run to the JUSTICE. Simultaneously, this also might explain why the Eternal (Immortal) God was so satisfied, as if He predicted all it, because on the seventh day he decided to rest from all His work. As far the secret plan of His, to my opinion, the essence of it is the unification of all human beings, whatever their racial, cultural, religious, ethnic, social... background was, by retaining the individual differences. In short, only in the worlds of dialectic (copy), where humans prevail, the true freedom of choice can emerge, understood in terms of distinguishing Good from evil (humane acting).
Implications and Consequences of the Imperfections of Imperfection
Apart from the said, it might be argued, just because of these imperfections (of the inherited imperfection), no one and nothing in physical terms (matter) can overcome the GAP that separates eternity DIA infinity and time DIA space [one of the multitude of copies of the eternal model], as an implication of the previously created gap that separates an eternal model from the eternity DIA infinity (THE ULTIMATE REALITY). Or put it in another way, no one managed to stop the (flowing) time DIA space except in the developed models of reality based on it, precisely because of the continual refreshment, renewal, and the reviving it with the breath of Everlasting God: the spirit of His. This continuity (continuousness dia permanency) of the flowing time DIA space can be perceived, detected and observed in the world of numbers too. In short, it is manifested in the form of various mathematical (irrational, incommensurable) puzzles [computing in absolute terms the mathematical end-value], such as the square root of 2, 3, 5, 7... or Pi (π) value [the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter: 3.14159..., of an ellipse], and the like.
As an ultimate result of the dialectical tensions between time DIA space and eternity DIA infinity, which acts in hidden (both behind and beyond it), seen from the perspective of the qualitative (dialectical) math, the zero is not nothing in absolute terms because these imperfections (of imperfection) are going to increase over time DIA space, as a final result of the accumulation of these imperfections (of imperfections) in the eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces [by conveying from the source of eternity DIA infinity some kind of the hidden energy] into something. Or uttered it in terms of the dialectical (qualitative) math, the "sum" (more properly ACCUMULATION) of these tiny (infinitely small) point-punctures (pores DIA spores) of time (in time) DIA space makes zero [pore DIA spore + pore DIA spore > pore DIA spore (and so on in the eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces, until this accumulation is >=< 0)], and for this reason, 0 + 0 > 0 (=< 1), 1+1 > 2 (=< 3), 3+3 > 6 (=< 7), 7+7 > 12 (=< 13), 13+13 > 24 (=< 25), and so on.
Synergistic Effect and Antagonistic Effect
A well-known and the simplest manifestation of this phenomenon [of this mode of operation of (eternity of) times DIA (infinity of) spaces (in hidden)] is known as the conception of the synergism and antagonism (disergism: negative synergistic effect). The synergistic effect is manifested and interpreted in the everyday reality of time DIA space (copy) in terms of that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts (dialects). In other words, the acting of two (or a lot of) dialects, understood in dialectical creatively interactive terms, will produce a synergistic effect, unless they manage to increase each other's effectiveness when acting together. To cut this long story short, to be resolved in the dialectical sense the unknown dilemma (of the “mathematical computation”) of their joined acting in connection with the final (creative) outcome of the synergistic (positive, qualitative) effect, neutral synergistic effect, and antagonistic effect (negative synergistic effect), that is (">=<") whether it is about the synergistic effect, or with the antagonistic effect, or with the neutral synergistic effect
- [the equal value, understood in terms of both qualitative (dialectical) math and quantitative (dynamic) math],
it was also used the pictorially linguistic script for this advanced (QUALITATIVE) way of the CREATIVELY INTERACTIVE communication of dialects (parts) in TIME [future, emotively emotional dia physical presence, past] DIA SPACE [spirit, mind dia reason, matter], understood in terms of a "mathematical" explanation of this phenomenon.
Synergism and the Three Basic Dialectical Principles, Aspects, Properties and Manifestations of Time DIA Space
The Four Primary DIA Proto Paradigmatic Presumptions of the Dialectical Interactive Approach: The Unity and Interpermeation of Dialectical Opposites in Time DIA Space (The First Basic Dialectical Principle)
Germinating DIA Potentially Blossomed Eight-Pointed Star: Transition and Transformation of the Accummulated Quantity and Quality in Time DIA Space into a New Quality (The First Phase of the Second Basic Dialectical Principle)
A Blossomed, Potentially Ripe Fruit - Bearing Twelve - Pointed Star: Metamorphose and Transfiguration of the Accummulated Quality in Time DIA Space into a Higher Quality (The Second Phase of the Second Basic Dialectical Principle)
Fruitful DIA Potentially Germinating Four-Pointed Star: Everything in Time DIA Space undergoes Development and becomes its own Dialectical Contradiction (The Third Basic Dialectical Principle)
THE CREATIVE EXPANSES OF A FOUR - TRIANGULAR STAR: The Unity and Interpermeation of Dialectical Opposites at a New Level of Time DIA Space (The First Basic Dialectical Principle at a New Level of Time DIA Space, and so on in the Eternity of Times DIA Infinity of Spaces: the Ground Plan of the Pyramid of Cheops in Egypt)
A good example of this "pictorially linguistic script" is the picturesque presentation and interpretation of the three basic dialectical principles, aspects, properties and manifestations in (of) time DIA space. Who of you could think that a so simple pictorial presentation of these four antique substances (fire, water, air, earth) has SOMETHING TO DO with the three basic dialectical principles, aspects, properties and manifestations in (of) time DIA space? In short, this PICTURESQUE and pictorial display of the worlds of dialectic is the major feature that distinguish the dialectical interactive approach from other methodological approaches. Seen from this methodological perspective, the synergistic effect can be symbolically represented by a blossomed, potentially fruit bearing twelwe-pointed star, whilst the antagonistic effect was represented by a parallelogram (a barren creative upshot). In other words, only this blossomed, potentially fruit bearing twelve-pointed star can produce a fruitful DIA potentially germinating four-pointed star (seed). Or uttered it in a PROACTIVE way, only the germinating DIA potentially blossomed eight-pointed star can be transformed into a blossomed, potentially fruit bearing twelwe-pointed star.
Dialectical Numbers and Letters of the Pictographically Linguistic Script
These very complex dialectical contents of the afore explained conceptions of synergism and antagonism were graphically illustrated in a pictorial way using various forms of stars, understood in the sense of utilization of their qualitative properties, that was also a part of the hidden (lost) pre-ancient knowledge. In other words, for this graphical presentation, it was used the PRE-ANCIENT perceiving and awareness that within each hexagon can be drawn a six-pointed star and vice-versa. This essential feature (of the dialectic) is valid and applicable FOR EACH KIND OF STAR, allowing within these star-like creatively interactive frameworks to be presented and taken place dialectical processes of different levels of complexity, as well as providing a possibility to be creatively combined and dialectically synthesized with each other. In this way was also opened a pathway for the qualitatively mathematical presentation of other two dialectical principles, aspects, properties and manifestations in time DIA space, as well as it was shown, how the three basic dialectical principles proceed from each other and continue at each new level of time (with)in eternity DIA infinity of spaces of these considered worlds of dialectic. These unutterably complex dialectical contents and the related aspects, properties and manifestations of the worlds of dialectic were graphically presented DIA symbolized by a FOUR - TRIANGULAR STAR(S).
Spiritual Re-enlightenment as a Culmination of the Dialectics of Dialectics DIA Negations of Negations in action
By the way, the three basic dialectical principles, aspects, properties and manifestations of the time DIA space also describe the cycles of life DIA living. For example, the first dialectical principle and manifestation of time DIA space can represent a seed or a zygote (single cell). On the other hand, the first stage of the second basic dialectical principle represents the development of an embryo in the uterus, or a swelling seed in the soil, whereas the second stage of this dialectical principle represents the growing a plant, a living being until was reached the mature age. In other words, the first phase of this dialectical principle is a prerequisite for successfully completing the second one. Because everything in time DIA space undergoes development, the third basic dialectical principle, aspect, property and manifestation of the time (in time) DIA space represents the (fruits with) seeds, offspring, and the like, which are, in fact, the own dialectical contradiction of their creators. This cycle of life DIA living, understood in the sense of acting primary law of dialectic, continues at a higher and higher level of time DIA space, or at a lower (and lower) level of time DIA space, or at an equal one, or intermittently UP ↔ DOWN in time DIA space, if you so will, from generation to generation. In short, these dialectical, interactively creative contents take place, both in the quantitative and qualitative sense [a seed ⇄ a plant ⇢ more seeds ⇄ more plants], within the endless expanses of this four - triangular star: the first basic dialectical principle, aspect, property and manifestation at a new level of development of the time DIA space.
Or said it in a methodological way, within these dialectical sieves set in progress has being cultivated QUALITY for the appropriate level of development of time DIA space. The culmination of these initiated dia-processess of the accumulation of quality in time DIA space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter) from generation to generation is the spiritual re-enlightenment (by God) as a counterpart to the miraculous acting of a chancy mutation according to the scientific explanation and interpretation of these ("natural") phenomena. Actually, seen from the point of view of the developed dialectical interactive approach, this spiritual re-enlightenment is the (right) missing link that truly leads to the emerging (highly) illuminated persons, peculiar species and plants......, and in a very (, very) dialectically long run to the emergence of a new genus, of a new species a great spiritual dialectical breakthrough], as a final result of the dialectics of dialectics DIA negations of negations in action, which has been continuously supported by the effect and the way the primary dialectical law works. In other words, here the word goes about the ultimate purpose of this dialectical long-term operation of the primary law of dialectic.
Does Time have a Beginning or End, seen from the Perspective of the Dialectical Interactive Approach?
So does time have a beginning or end? To be answered this question, the primary law of dialectic must be modified in this EXCEPTIONAL case. In other words, a more appropriate formulation of this primary law of dialectic in this particular case is that it begins within the realm of time DIA space (copy) with the ...rebirth instead of the birth, because the primordial ...birth of the Eternal (Immortal) God happened somewhere in the kingdom of eternity DIA infinity, and not in the realm of time DIA space (copy). As a result of it, it might be argued, with the re-birth of the Living God within time DIA space (copy)
- [The Lord-God, who created Adam and.... Eva (The Old Testament: earthly version of creation), and known as Father in the New Testament, because without a creator, as it has already been argued by me there is no creative result: universe, for example];
- seen from the methodological viewpoint of the dialectical interactive approach, turn thy attention that by this act of the original manifestation of the Living God a COPY of time DIA space was actually created (1.Moses-2: 4-25: earthly version of creation), which is based on the heavenly human version of the creation of the heavens DIA earthens [the eternal DIA infinite model created and ACCOMPLISHED by the Everlasting (IMMORTAL) God: 1.Moses-1 & 2: 1-3];
- note also that the Human (dia Humane) Being was THE LAST creative act [the sixth day (cyclus) of the eternity DIA infinity] within the heavenly, human version of the creation of the heavens DIA earthens (1.Moses - 1 : 26-28), while in the earthly version of the creation of DIA copying the eternal model (1.Moses-2: 4-25) Adam was THE FIRST living creature, who was created and presented on this great stage DIA scene of His. And after that, not to be alone, the Lord God created all the beasts, birds, .... and Eva (1.Moses-2) from the ground (of four elements);
- this clearly shows that here the word goes about two different events separated in sense of time DIA space (model DIA copy), and not about the one-same event that is often interpreted in this simple-minded (simply reasonable) way by those who use the so-called fused (merged) mind-spirit for the (creative) orientation in the eternity of times DIA infinity of spaces.
with the help of the (Holy) Spirit of the Eternal (Immortal) God, the time started to flow DIA space was created, and afterward much later it ALSO began to be recorded in the memory of the created organic plants, human being(s), creatures, animals.... within the dialectical creatively interactive framework of the dialects of mind dia reason (THE MEDIUM OF SPACE) DIA the appropriated physical dia emotively emotional presence (THE MEDIUM OF TIME). Pay thy attention, in this (religious explanation of the) way of creating of all and everything, the (Holy) Spirit plays the central role. For further info read also the Far Eastern religions. Did the SPIRIT also play the central role within the creations of (the conception of) eternity DIA infinity, which are beyond understanding? To my opinion, yes, He did. By the way said, turn also thy attention to a further manifestation of the inherent imperfection (of imperfection) within time DIA space (copy), which was already recorded in the living reality in a proverbial way of expression (based on the wisdom of gone times). Namely, for each rule, there is an exception just for the purpose of confirming this major rule. From this rule of time DIA space (copy) has not been exempted the primary law of dialectic too, clearly showing that looking for PERFECTION within a copy of the model of eternity DIA infinity is ilusionary (a nonsense).
The Four Pre-Ancient Ways for Discovering of the Unknown in Time DIA Space
The Background Simulative Assumptions of the Dialectical Interactive Approach
Either way, such solutions of puzzles of the worlds of dialectic using (the dialect) spirit cannot be verified too in the scientific terms because for the contemporary scientists the happenings described in the Holy Bible and other Holy Books are fairly tales. But they are not treated in the same way in the dialectical interactive approach, for according to it, each creative upshot (creating knowledge) has to be reflected through the prism of the great pyramid of culture, philosophy, art, and science. Recall, the dialectical interactive approach is based on methodological postulates of the pre-ancient (hidden) knowledge. In accordance to it, there were four basic ways that led to the discovery of the unknown, which could be expressed in everyday language as the (creatively interactive dialects of) PHILOSOPHY, CULTURE, ART and SCIENCE. Regardless of this, the contemporary science still does not allow crossing over the firmly established boundaries between and among these four essential realms of the human acting. Even the interdisciplinary approach within the boundaries of science is still an exemption rather than the desired rule. For this reason, let me, thou, us return in the realm of still unsolved puzzles of the macro-universe and micro-universe. There are plenty of them.
Challenges of the Developing a Confirmed Theory of the Macro-Universe and Micro-Universe
Such a question is: whether the general theory of relativity is truly valid globally, that is in the realm of entire macro-universe. Seen from the dialectical perspective, it is not completely valid, understood in the sense of physical (presence of a living being) DIA PRACTICAL meaning of this notion [reflected through prism of the common sense of a human being]. In other words, in which extent, seen from the perspective of the span of time DIA the appropriate scope of space, it is applicable and useable within the so called (scientifically) observable universe because observable [with the help of the five scientific senses] and reachable [in the sense of physical presence] is not the same, seen from the perspective of the common sense. For example, if the total lifespan of a star with the mass of the Sun is about 10 billion years, does it make any sense to be visited a star that is still observable, but it is already dead, or it will be dead at the arrival of an expedition, or it will be in the stage of life-development of a RED GIANT, even if it was created a space-shuttle that approximately moves by the speed of light? Although someone might argue that whatever there came into being (black hole, super-nova... star with inhabitable planet) the general theory is still valid there, it is a small consolation if any, seen from the point of view of the PRACTICAL appliance of this theoretical conception. In other words, it has to be found out within which concrete span of time DIA the suitable scope of space, the general theory of relativity is applicable because behind this boundary of the applicable universe also begins the solving of task of this kind of SCIENTIFIC IMPERFECTION, given to the "ghosts of the spermatozoon and ovum" within the realm of micro-universe.
To cut this long story short, if scientists are able to solve this puzzle of dialectically remote vastness of the macro-universe in terms of the qualitative math
- [qualitative aspects, properties and manifestations of the dialectic, as a part of the unsolved puzzles of this dialectical way of understanding the time DIA space],
it will be made a few BIG STEPS in the direction of solving challenges of the related puzzles of micro-universe. By the way, that is why the macro-universe was made so large as well as it continues with further expansion [helping in this way scientists to solve all arisen questions regarding time DIA space]. Apart from this, seen from the methodological perspective, the applied scientific method is not at all in compliance with their typical manner of solving an identified problem in such a "ghostly" way, particularly, when they do not accept the existence of ghost (spirit), even the existence of mind, that is, a solution without previously to be verified in scientific terms (with the help of their five basic senses).
Is there still Need for a Spiritual Leadership during Journeys into the Unknown?
Keep in mind, an imperfect scientific model developed for traveling through such enormous expanses of the macro-universe may lead to a fatal outcome for the members of a crew. This is not unknown in our past. Witnesses of these happenings of the past are numerous sank ships in the sea. Very often only the invisible hand of God, or of the goddess Fortuna, if you so please, rescued the lives of many members of crews, who managed to survive the storms of sea. Some others, guided also with this "invisible hand" managed to fulfill their life-missions, or to discover something even greater. One of them was Christopher Columbus. Although during preparation for the finding a shorter way to India, he applied the most advanced scientific methods and techniques of his time DIA the suitable space (spirit, mind dia reason, matter), he did not discovered what he searched for but an unknown continent. Moreover, he died still firmly believing that he discovered the shorter way to India.
- Although Columbus discovered a new continent searching for India [driven by the dialects - mind and matter: with logic and materialistic motives, determined and defined from the perspective of the big picture of those gone times], it might be argued that the discovery of America was driven by the eternal desire (of the SPIRIT) to find out (disclose): Who I ⇄ thou ⇄ we are, where I ⇄ thou ⇄ we come from, are I ⇄ thou ⇄ we alone in the worlds of dialectic and the like. Expressed and interpreted this interactively creative content in a dialectical way, the meaning of it is that they INTUITED, sensed, felt and "knew" it, that is, they (subconsciously) were aware of the existence of each other....
In the Wisdom is Hidden the Real Might
This happened for a few centuries ago (1492). His trip into the unknown lasted less than two and half months to prevail a few thousands of kilometers that is incomparable to the long distances of the macro-universe. These happenings, in spite of continually making enormous technological progress, arise the following questions: will the future expeditions still have a need for this invisible hand during the journey into the unknown? What is thy answer? If it is confirmative, is there a need for a suitable (spiritual) dialect to be encompassed and included such a ghostly dialectical content into the developed SCIENTIFIC models of reality? Or it shall be continued with the ignoring puzzles of the unknown in the way as it contemporary scientists do, in spite of the fact that the unknown at all times significantly exceeds the known (scientific “facts”) because within time DIA space (copy) the ignorance is eternal whilst the knowledge is temporary? In other words, it might be argued, if it is true that knowledge is power, then in WISDOM (the very essence of the gone times) was hidden the real might. What is thy opinion?