SOCIETAL ORDERS (OF THE RULE) OF NATIOCRATISM - NATIOCRACY AS A NEW ESTABLISHED POLITICAL AND CULTURAL SYSTEM (OF VALUES)
The Natiocratic Pyramid
Recall, all known societal orders to the present days (slavery, feudalism, capitalism, communism, socialism) were based on the crowd DIA group way of thinking, where the main roles (in different proportions of influence) were played by the suitable actors: state, network structure, (semi-)state's and private institutions, various (societal and social) organisations, (international) companies, and the like. But in none of them was the focus truly put on good and humane citizens (human beings) except in a formal (propaganda) sense. Reconsidered from the standpoint of the INDIVIDUAL RESIDENT (citizen), having too much in common DIA pervading each other, either in an open way or in some way of the hidden manifestation, such as the various modern ways of manifestating serfdom and slavery (subjugation) based on accrued debts, various ways of discrimination, (vile) encouragement and favoritism of evil choices and paths, and the like, all these societal orders were termed NATIOCRATISM by this creator of knowledge. The main feature of all natiocratic social orders, apart from being based on the crowd DIA group way of thinking and comprehending of the (recti)linear space [FUSED MIND, matter] and time [past ⇢ PRESENT TIME ⇢ future], is an abuse of the concept of the NATION [HENCE THE IRONIC NAME OF THIS ESTABLISHED POLITICAL SYSTEM: "NATIOCRACY"], demanding the sacrifice of all and everything in its name and benefit, including its citizens too. By going in a methodological way behind this dialectical content, the hidden narrow-minded interests of members of the ruling natiocratic elite is not difficult to recognize. As a result of this approach to the (political, economical....) organization of society, IN EACH established natiocratic societal order, A FEW PERCENTAGES of its inhabitants (elitist upper castes) plays a major role, and therefore makes decisions about everything important to society as a whole.
The Background Simulative Assumptions of the Dialectic Interactive Approach
In addition to this, by this methodological approach more light has been shed on the existing NATIOCRATIC way the various buzzwords are comprehended and understood, such as freedom (of speech, creative acting, .... of will, of choice), democracy and the like. As it will be shown, all major characteristics of the natiocratic form of the rule are also retained within the concept of (representative) democracy, including the intolerable DISCREPANCY, understood in terms of the preferential (privileged) treatment of group's societal categories (companies, for example) DIA crowd's (mob's) attitude and approach of the state [accordingly of the network of militar and market structure, for example], COMPARED WITH their treatment of individual beings (citizens). And the deeper this gap in the treatment of citizens and the established natiocratic societal institutions is, the greater the degree of (“enslavement's and serfdom's”) DEPENDENCE of citizens on them is, and for this reason, there is less true manifestation and expression of freedom (of speech, of will, of choice, ....) in such societies. Seen from the point of view of the developed dialectical interactive approach, criticising something or someone (THESIS), without proposing an alternative way of soving the perceived creative challenge (ANTITHESIS), reflected through the prism of the great pyramid of culture, philosophy, art and science makes no sense, this creator of knowledge suggested how another form of democratic governance could be implemented, which takes into account the interests of good and HUMAN(E) INDIVIDUALS (citizens). To make it feasible to put this idea into living, working, business .... creative reality, IT IS NECESSARY to reduce the accumulated EVIL within such a society over time DIA space (SYNTHESIS DIA THE RENEWED THESIS), whose source was very well explained and elaborated in the presented natiocratic concept of simple(st) DIA vulgar mind. Within such an established democratic political system, all decisions concerning the future of the majority of its citizens, and especially their children, should be OBLIGATORY (re)solved by a civil (DEMOCRATIC) REFERENDUM. The more important the content of the vote under referendum consideration, the higher the percentage is required to accept the referendum decision.