SOCIETAL ORDERS (OF THE RULE) OF NATIOCRATISM - NATIOCRACY AS A NEW ESTABLISHED POLITICAL AND CULTURAL SYSTEM (OF VALUES)
The Natiocratic Pyramid
Recall, all known societal orders to the present days (slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism, communism) were based on the crowd DIA group way of thinking, where the major roles (in different proportions of influence) were played by the suitable actors: state, network structure, (semi-)state's and private institutions, various (societal and social) organisations, (international) companies, and the like. But in no any of them truly was put focus on good and humane human beings, except in formal (propagandistic) terms. Reconsidered from a standpoint of an INDIVIDUAL (citizen), having too much in common DIA pervading each other, either in a plain way or in some kind of the hidden manifesting, such as are, the various modern ways of manifestation of enslaving, based on the incurred debts, various ways of discrimination, (perfidious) encouraging and favouring evil choices and ways, and the like, all these societal orders were (re)named by this creator of knowledge as NATIOCRATISM. The major feature of all natiocratic societal orders, apart from being based on the crowd DIA group way of thinking and comprehending of the (recti)linear space [FUSED MIND, matter] and time [past ⇢ PRESENT TIME ⇢ future], is misuse of the notion NATION [HEREFROM ORIGINATES THE IRONICAL NAME OF THIS ESTABLISHED POLITICAL SYSTEM: "NATIOCRACY"], demanding the sacrificing of all and everything in its name and behalf, including its citizens. By going in a methodological way behind this dialectical content, it is not difficult to be recognised the hidden narrow-minded interests of members of the ruling natiocratic elite. As a result of this approach, IN EACH established natiocratic societal order, the main role plays and thus makes decisions about all important for the society as the whole, A FEW PERCENTAGES of its inhabitants (elitist upper castes).
The Background Simulative Assumptions of the Dialectic Interactive Approach
In addition to this, by this methodological approach was shed more light on the existing NATIOCRATIC way of conceiving, comprehending and understanding various buzz-notions, such as freedom (of speech, creative acting, .... of will, of choice), democracy and the like. As it will be shown, within the (representative) democracy were also retained all major characteristics of the natiocratic form of the rule, including the intolerable DISCREPANCY, understood in terms of the preferential (preferable) treatment of group's societal categories (companies, for example) DIA crowd's (mob's) attitude and approach by state (accordingly by the network of militar and market structure, for example) COMPARED TO the treatment of individual beings (citizens). And as deeper this gap is, in treatment of citizens and the established natiocratic societal institutions, as it is greater the degree of (“enslavement's and serfdom's”) DEPENDENCE of citizens from them, and from this reason, there are less of true manifestation of freedom (of speech, of will, of choice, ....) there. Seen from the point of view of the developed dialectical interactive approach, the criticising of something or someone (THESIS), without to be proposed an alternative (ANTITHESIS), reflected through the prism of great pyramid of the culture, philosophy, art and science, has no meaning, this creator of knowledge has suggested how could be carried out an another form of the democratic rule, that takes care about interests of the good and HUMAN(E) INDIVIDUALS (citizens). In order to be feasible carrying out this idea into the living, working, business .... creative reality, IT IS NECESSARY to be reduced the accumulated EVIL over time DIA space within such a society (SYNTHESIS DIA THE RENEWED THESIS), whose source was elaborated very well within the presented natiocratic concept of the simple(st) DIA vulgar mind. Within such an established democratic political system, all decisions, concerning the future of most of its citizens, and their children in particular, should be OBLIGATORY (re)solved by the all-citizens' (DEMOCRATIC) REFERENDUM. As more important the dialectical content under consideration is, as the higher percentage is needed to be referendum's decision accepted.